I'm getting ROASTED, how bad did I lose this trade?

[craphit1]

Gave 1.08, late 2020 first, late 2020 second, and Sam Darnold

Received 1.01

Reasoning: 1.01 has a much higher hit rate than my late picks will have, and post NFL draft there will be a player or two that emerge as the consensus 1.01 IMO.

What are your thoughts?

[thebeast]

How do you know the 2020 first will be late? I’ve seen it happen many times, one or two injuries and the future pick becomes very early.

[abloom]

Well first things first... what are the lineup requirements and scoring system?

If its a 1QB normalish league I think its fine, maybe you lost a little, but its hard to tell and dependent on your other QBs

If its a 2QB or SF league yea you lost... by a lot

[WhatWouldDitkaDo]

I don't think this is that bad at all assuming it's a 1QB league.

[Jason3123]

Is this a 1 QB league? I agree 1.1 has a higher hit rate but this is the worst year to have #1 in some time in my opinion.

[captain howdy]

I think its fair to roast you. Its obviously not a superflex or a 2 qb starter league..but if QBs have any advantage whatsoever...such as 6 point tds...then I think you overpaid. Not egregious tho

Also, given you are targetting the 1.1..the trade really revolves around who the player you are trading for is..is it Metcalf..Jacobs? Who?

If you traded for 1.1 without actually liking a specific player (pending absurdities in landing spots)..then I think you made a tactical error as well.

[Jigga94]

I wouldve kept the picks. If there was a clear 1.01 it was easily worth it but... Who is your 1.01?

[slaughterrt]

Trade is fine if you like a guy and it’s not a superflex/2QB. Don’t worry about what the other say if you like the trade.

[tperry14]

I think you lost in a 1QB league. Horrible if 2QB. I just do not think that the difference in the top 3-5ish picks this season are that big so its not a great year to have the 1.01 in general because it does not have a significant value bump to the next pick

[Farley]

Trade is fine if you like a guy and it’s not a superflex/2QB. Don’t worry about what the other say if you like the trade.

Agreed. As long as it's a 1QB with 14 teams or less, then you did great. Ignore the noise.

[briank]

Gave 1.08, late 2020 first, late 2020 second, and Sam Darnold

Received 1.01

Reasoning: 1.01 has a much higher hit rate than my late picks will have, and post NFL draft there will be a player or two that emerge as the consensus 1.01 IMO.

What are your thoughts?

Is this for the team in your sig because I wouldn't assume that team's pick is going to be late. Your QB and WR are solid, but everything else is pretty bleak and the 1.01 probably wont help either position. I don't hate the trade for an actual contender. BTW, my WR core is better.

[craphit1]

Updated my Sig

[MEuRaH]

Dynasty is a game. If you wanna play the game and "go for it", who cares what others say. You got that 1.01 man, enjoy it!

............... but you better hit if you want to win this deal. In a PPR league, you don't have any PPR RBs (Ekeler is but...), and only 3 WRs plus Ebron who is so far a 1-year wonder. I don't know what you're starting requirements are, but one injury and you could miss the playoffs.

But for now, I like it. If you make a good pick that works out in your favor and you make the playoffs, then I like it.

[Vcize]

It's fair. People aren't stoked over the 1.1 right now but that could change if someone lands in a standout spot or if Jacobs gets drafted in the 1st round.

I do agree with about though that if the 2020 pick is coming from the team in your sig I wouldn't be so overly confident that it's going to be late. But still, it's an OK deal. Not worth getting roasted over for sure.

[abloom]

Not bad then, I would have preferred to use that value to trade for a rb though