This is a great question. I think I answered it somewhere else already but it bears repeating and I'll try to phrase it better this time around (I was in a rush out the door last time I answered it).M-Dub wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:24 amIt’s funny, I’m a metrics/analytics guy by default, but I genuinely LOVE your RB report, mainly because you clearly explain both your background as a coach/scout and the specific traits you look for in a prospect.
Out of curiosity, as an avowed film grinder, how much weight do you personally put into athletic measurables? Like if you had to divide it into percentages, how much stock do you put put into film vs. metrics?
The ONLY point of metrics is to verify what you see on film. That's it. If they don't match up, you have yourself a problem. I gave Sanders my #1 overall ranking, and BOOM, 4.5 40 with tons of other great measurables. Verified.
I gave Justice Hill a speed-only rating only, and BOOM, that's all he really did at the combine. Great 40, great vert & broad jump (which shows he has great burst). Nothing else to note. He simply verified what I saw on tape. Doesn't elevate him at all.
Holyfield I said was quick on his feet, able to sink his hips, but couldn't catch out of the backfield. Not only was his 40 time terrible, but so was his vertical & broad jump, showing that he was neither fast nor quick. Something is wrong there, it doesn't match up. He dropped an easy pass though, so that matched up.
So now I gotta look into Holyfield. Did he have a nagging hamstring? Was he sick? Did he put on weight? Or was his tape tom-foolery?
This is why I go through 3 rounds of evaluation. The 1st round is what I expect to have happen. The 2nd round is the adjustment round. The 3rd round is the post-draft round. Usually after round 3, I'm dead on.