In start 2TE, I doubt Fant gets to the 1.04XclickX wrote: ↑Wed Jan 16, 2019 4:23 pmI just joined a TE premium league, 0.75 ppr where we start 2 TEs and TEs receive 1.5 ppr. Where do you think Fant should go? I own picks 1.04,1.05 & 1.07. I’m new to start 2 Te, te premium so I’m not sure if I wait until the 1.07 or should I grab him at the 1.05? The stud TEs score more than the stud wrs in this format from what I’ve seen reviewing last years stats. For instant Ertz and Kelce averaged 22 ppg. Adams 20 , AB, 19.8, DHop/ MT 18.
Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
I would definitely be willing to pull the trigger on a TE at 5th overall in that format. His college teammate TJ Hockenson, Alabama's Irv Smith Jr and Jace Sternberger are all candidates to potentially challenge Fant for first TE off the board in the NFL draft, but Fant certaintly has the highest fantasy upside of any TE this year. I would very strongly consider TE with both picks in that format.
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
If there is enough interest I can set up a two tight end category similar to what I did with superflex. You guys let me know...
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
I didn't want this to get lost down the board.
Submit your rookie rankings here: http://mizelle.net/mfl/2019/rookies/
Right now there have been 12 PPR and 4 Superflex sets of rankings submitted.
Submit your rookie rankings here: http://mizelle.net/mfl/2019/rookies/
Right now there have been 12 PPR and 4 Superflex sets of rankings submitted.
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
I have my rankings in and will likely use this in the 2019 draft with my current ranking structure. Nice work mizelle!!
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
Is this class as bad as some are making it out to be? Or is this more an echo chamber thats blowing things out of proportion just because there isnt a standout 1.01?
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
Mostly because of no 1.01. I also think RB and QB are very weak. When you're waiting to judge a guy on his landing spot, it's usually not the best sign. Plus we've been spoiled the past 2 years with those positions...
That said, WR and TE look solid.
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
The reason I am asking is someone is trying to buy one of my top 4 WRs for Moore and 2x 1sts. I personally dont hate this but I wasnt sure about the mid to late 1sts of this class.
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
It's not bad. Depends on how late the picks are. Value could fall off fast in this 1st round. With your team though, you can start all 4 of those top 10 WR (drool), Mixon and Chubb and then there's one toss up flex it seems. I suppose if you believe in Moore to be a decent flex (I do) and think you can improve the 2nd flex spot with flipping those picks or drafting someone, it would be worth it.Bot101 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 22, 2019 7:48 pmThe reason I am asking is someone is trying to buy one of my top 4 WRs for Moore and 2x 1sts. I personally dont hate this but I wasnt sure about the mid to late 1sts of this class.
I'd have a tight grip on those 4 though because I know how I am with Tyreek/Julio/Cooks right now. Setting that lineup is always fun
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
When we talk about drafting whichever rb gets drafted by the chiefs it is definately a bad sign. We should be exicited about a player if they land in Cleveland or kc. I know a putz in another league that wouldn’t draft Chubb because of his landing spot and ended up taking freeman. I brought it up a week ago (because I’m like that) and he still stands by his decision making process. And that is why you fail.
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
Yeah I agree. For some reason my gut is telling me OBJ is becoming a sell. So he was the one I was leaning towards selling.
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
Here are the latest and greatest rankings:
Re: Way to early 2019 rookie ADP
I have the 1.10 this year and I'm very happy with the quality of player I'll be able to draft. For round 1 this draft is fine. I'm not sure if it has a worthy 1.01 or how deep the 2nd round will be, but this is looking like a fine draft.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 92 guests