Week X Discussion

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
hoos89
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5631
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2012 4:53 pm

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby hoos89 » Sun Nov 11, 2018 6:46 pm

Cameron Giles wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 6:38 pm
hoos89 wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 5:58 pm Aaron Jones = RB1 RoS?
Anyone who faces the Dolphins = RB1 for that week.
He's averaging 12.9 PPG on the season and has more or less taken over that backfield over the last few weeks so I expect him to average more than that RoS. RB1 is about 16 ppg. I don't think it's a stretch. Also 1) Jones was more than just an RB1 today and 2) the Dolphins aren't that bad against the run. They allow the 8th most PPG to the position (and a pretty decent chunk of that was one game against NE).
Last edited by hoos89 on Sun Nov 11, 2018 7:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Team 1: 2012-2016
2013 Champion, 2012 Runner-Up


Team 2: 12 Team PPR - 1 QB, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 R/W/T, 23 man rosters, est. 2016
2021 Champion, 2020 Runner-up
Tua, Purdy Geno, Carr
JT, Ekeler, Mostert, Javonte, Chuba, D. Harris, M. Carter, J. Hill, Spiller
Chase, AJB, Amon-Ra, Aiyuk, Olave, DJM, Dell
Andrews, McBride, Engram
IR(3): Chubb, M. Williams, Rodgers
Taxi(4): J. Palmer, Tolbert, T. Palmer
2024 Picks: 3, 4, 5

Team 3: 12 Team PPR, 6 pt Pass TD - 1 QB, 2 RB, 3 WR, 1 TE, 3 R/W/T, 28 man rosters, est. 2019
2021 Champion, 2022 Runner-up
Jackson, Love, Tannehill, Z. Wilson
Barkley, Mixon, Mostert, J. Wilson, CEH, Gaskin, J. Hill
J. Jefferson, Diggs, Waddle, Evans, Metcalf, Sutton, R. Moore, Slayton, Berrios, Carter, Dortch, Powell, Raymond
Kelce, Dissly, Hooper
2024 Picks: 1

User avatar
Pac_Eddy
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5056
Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 7:12 pm

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby Pac_Eddy » Sun Nov 11, 2018 6:53 pm

PR0v3 wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 5:45 pm Any see Anthony Miller’s game? Does he it look like he can do this consistently?

He’s been on the comeup and looks like today was a breakout game!
He looked great. The only issue is low target volume. Hard trust him enough to start him in fantasy.
Not all that counts can be counted. Not all that can be counted counts.

User avatar
Friction
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3171
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 8:29 pm
Location: Land of 10,000 Safe Spaces

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby Friction » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:15 pm

Is the boxscore wrong or does Cooper really have 5 catches for 11 yards, with a long of 13? That cannot be accurate.
Valhalla's Father
12 Team 1PPR 1QB/1-3RB/1-3 WR/1TE/1DST
QB:Brady
RB: Barkley, Chubb, Jacobs, Henry, Mack, Etienne
WR: Nuk, Thielen, Cooks, Diontae, Pittman, Gallup
TE: Henry

User avatar
ArrylT
Degenerate
Degenerate
Posts: 9543
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:32 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby ArrylT » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:21 pm

So I do not think many people thought Miami would defeat GB - but this is exactly why NE keeps winning year after year - GB was 'vulnerable' and a win by Miami puts them 1 game behind NE in the division.

Obviously Brock Osweiler is not an ideal QB - but the point is that even when the Patriots lose - they do not really hurt themselves because their divisional rivals can never take advantage.

Just imagine if Tom Brady is able to keep playing until 45 like he plans ...
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..

User avatar
ArrylT
Degenerate
Degenerate
Posts: 9543
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:32 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby ArrylT » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:22 pm

Friction wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:15 pm Is the boxscore wrong or does Cooper really have 5 catches for 11 yards, with a long of 13? That cannot be accurate.
He has 5 for 51 yards.
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..

FantasyFreak
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 27211
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2014 1:03 am

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby FantasyFreak » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:27 pm

I remember when certain people were saying they wouldn't pick up Penny if he was on waivers, etc. People pass judgment on rookies way too quickly. He looked good today.
"You're a creep. You got caught.." -Dan Patrick

fruity pebbles
Practice Squad
Practice Squad
Posts: 150
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2018 7:00 am

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby fruity pebbles » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:37 pm

Dak with 27 pass attempts and Zeke with 10 carries through 3 is really inexcusable

User avatar
ArrylT
Degenerate
Degenerate
Posts: 9543
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:32 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby ArrylT » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:37 pm

At least like a shiny nickel. ;)
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..

User avatar
Valhalla
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby Valhalla » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:38 pm

Blueboy wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 5:16 pm
Phaded wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 5:05 pm So - even when Carson comes back you have to think Penny has earned himself some future work, right?

11 carries, 102 yards and a touchdown.
Have to think so. Once the guy you drafted in the 1st has a breakout game, can you really sit him again?
Hue Jackson did...

User avatar
Blueboy
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1887
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby Blueboy » Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:50 pm

Valhalla wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 8:38 pm
Blueboy wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 5:16 pm
Phaded wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 5:05 pm So - even when Carson comes back you have to think Penny has earned himself some future work, right?

11 carries, 102 yards and a touchdown.
Have to think so. Once the guy you drafted in the 1st has a breakout game, can you really sit him again?
Hue Jackson did...
Hue was... a special case.

PingPwng
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 402
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 1:22 pm

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby PingPwng » Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:06 pm

Zach Ertz and Travis Kelce are the reason that TE should not be a position in fantasy football. I'm about to lose to a guy that forgot to set a kicker and started a WR on bye.

It's impossible to overcome that type of positional advantage. I'm getting my face kicked in.
Waiver Warriors|12 Teams|1PPR|1QB/2RB/3WR/1TE/1FLEX/1K/1DEF Roster 21 '14 R/U '17 Champ No '18 picks
QB:C. Newton/J. Goff
RB:T. Gurley/L. Bell NA/M. Mack/J. Mixon/S. Michel/K. Drake/R. Penny
WR:M. Evans/O. Beckham/T. Hill/ T. Boyd/A. Robinson/C. Godwin/D. Westbrook/A. Callaway
TE: I. Thomas/C. Brate/H. Henry (IR) K - M. Prater DEF - CHI

User avatar
ArrylT
Degenerate
Degenerate
Posts: 9543
Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2015 9:32 pm
Location: Canada

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby ArrylT » Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:11 pm

PingPwng wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:06 pm Zach Ertz and Travis Kelce are the reason that TE should not be a position in fantasy football. I'm about to lose to a guy that forgot to set a kicker and started a WR on bye.

It's impossible to overcome that type of positional advantage. I'm getting my face kicked in.
I assume that means you advocate either WR/TE or WR/RB/TE start positions then?
Please speak to clarion contrarion before considering the use of vetos..

PingPwng
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 402
Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2016 1:22 pm

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby PingPwng » Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:17 pm

ArrylT wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:11 pm
PingPwng wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:06 pm Zach Ertz and Travis Kelce are the reason that TE should not be a position in fantasy football. I'm about to lose to a guy that forgot to set a kicker and started a WR on bye.

It's impossible to overcome that type of positional advantage. I'm getting my face kicked in.
I assume that means you advocate either WR/TE or WR/RB/TE start positions then?
I'm advocating any option where I'm not forced to start a useless player against an elite league-winning piece that only 2 people can have in a league.
Waiver Warriors|12 Teams|1PPR|1QB/2RB/3WR/1TE/1FLEX/1K/1DEF Roster 21 '14 R/U '17 Champ No '18 picks
QB:C. Newton/J. Goff
RB:T. Gurley/L. Bell NA/M. Mack/J. Mixon/S. Michel/K. Drake/R. Penny
WR:M. Evans/O. Beckham/T. Hill/ T. Boyd/A. Robinson/C. Godwin/D. Westbrook/A. Callaway
TE: I. Thomas/C. Brate/H. Henry (IR) K - M. Prater DEF - CHI

User avatar
Valhalla
Legend
Legend
Posts: 5382
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 4:26 pm

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby Valhalla » Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:25 pm

PingPwng wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:17 pm
ArrylT wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:11 pm
PingPwng wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:06 pm Zach Ertz and Travis Kelce are the reason that TE should not be a position in fantasy football. I'm about to lose to a guy that forgot to set a kicker and started a WR on bye.

It's impossible to overcome that type of positional advantage. I'm getting my face kicked in.
I assume that means you advocate either WR/TE or WR/RB/TE start positions then?
I'm advocating any option where I'm not forced to start a useless player against an elite league-winning piece that only 2 people can have in a league.
So...be one of those teams?

There are other very useful tight ends. Kittle, Ebron, Burton, Howard, Cook to name some.

You can make the argument about rbs too. If you don’t have Gurley Kamara or Hunt, you’re at a huge disadvantage. If you don’t have Mahomes, you’re at a disadvantage.

User avatar
Bot101
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4695
Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2015 7:32 pm

Re: Week X Discussion

Postby Bot101 » Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:33 pm

PingPwng wrote: Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:06 pm Zach Ertz and Travis Kelce are the reason that TE should not be a position in fantasy football. I'm about to lose to a guy that forgot to set a kicker and started a WR on bye.

It's impossible to overcome that type of positional advantage. I'm getting my face kicked in.
Cry me a river. I faced Ertz, Ebron and Hooper across my 3 leagues and I'm about to be 0-3 unless OBJ and Barkley go nuclear tomorrow night. Smoke is flying from my ears right now...


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Sinatra's Liver and 65 guests