I don’t disagree with any of that I’d feel better about Ebron if he went to a team with a better offensive line.
The Colts line is awful and if Ebron can’t figure out how to block that might hurt his snap counts.
I don’t disagree with any of that I’d feel better about Ebron if he went to a team with a better offensive line.
jenkins.math wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 7:23 am Sell sell sell. Especially if you are rebuilding. Take the best offer and run.
You honestly think Ebron as the number 3 TE can keep this up? He was let go as a high draft pick for a reason. I would sell high on him and get out while the going is good. I assumed he would get something much better at this stage than a 3rd and scrubs. I would take a late first for him and call that a win.ArrylT wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 7:44 amjenkins.math wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 7:23 am Sell sell sell. Especially if you are rebuilding. Take the best offer and run.
Right the best way to rebuild is to sell young assets for the best offer you can get in that moment.
Ebron is 25. Not 28. Not 30. If it was Jared Cook or Jimmy Graham - then yes I would agree you should consider selling for the best offer you can get in your league. But when a player - regardless of position - is young and entering their prime there is no reason to sell them - unless you can get a real deal done - and when you advertise you are selling then the odds of your getting the right offer decrease not increase (because owners instinctively think bargain shop not buy high).
I mean if you can turn Ebron into a 1st/2nd and a TE like ASJ* or Hunter Henry* or OJ Howard* (ie done for season) from a contender who has no TEs, then that is a good deal. Or if you could get a WR or RB who is simmering that you like - say a Godwin or a Royce Freeman (highly doubtful imo) ... But if someone comes at you with a 3rd & an Ian Thomas / ESB / Dorsett ...
So no do not take the best offer and run - mull over the options and if they are found wanting - just hold onto Ebron. His trajectory is looking a lot more like Delanie Walker / Greg Olsen / Martellus Bennett - IE TEs who simmered for years and developed and then on a new team broke out for a nice 4+ year run. And since Ebron is 25 that run could be longer.
* - obviously you match the correct pick with the correct TE - like a 2nd with Howard for Ebron or a 1st with ASJ.
#1. Don't listen to this ^jenkins.math wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 7:23 am Sell sell sell. Especially if you are rebuilding. Take the best offer and run.
Yeah Detroit let him go in a cost-cutting move. His base salary would have been 8m in 2017 had they used his 5th year option. Detroit tried and could not afford Burton either. They use a 3 WR set and RBs (like Riddick) more than they need to funnel production through the TE. We can see from their offence again how productive TEs are doing now that Ebron is out of the picture.jenkins.math wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 8:07 am
You honestly think Ebron as the number 3 TE can keep this up? He was let go as a high draft pick for a reason. I would sell high on him and get out while the going is good. I assumed he would get something much better at this stage than a 3rd and scrubs. I would take a late first for him and call that a win.
He is also nothing like Greg Olsen, Delanie, Martellus, etc. You're taking a short sighted view on those guys and trying to match that to Ebron, which is apples to oranges. Delanie Walker sat behind Vernon Davis and others in SF for 7 years. That's why he wasn't fantasy relevant. Greg Olsen scored 5 or more TDs, while getting heavy targets from his 2nd year on. He was extremely fantasy relevant early and has been fairly consistent. Martellus Bennett also never became a full time starter until his 5th season, after he left the Cowboys and was behind Jason Witten.
Ebron was the main TE in a pass happy offense in Detroit, yet couldn't become fantasy relevant until now. Could he keep it up? I guess. Would I bet on it? Not at all. All the guys you mentioned really took off as soon as they got an opportunity and out from other better tight ends. That is the exact opposite of Ebron.
JFever said what I should have said in much less than I could have.JFever wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 8:17 am#1. Don't listen to this ^jenkins.math wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 7:23 am Sell sell sell. Especially if you are rebuilding. Take the best offer and run.
#2. TE is a position that takes time. It is also a position that is highly dependent on the system. Ebron is now mature enough (yet still very young for producing TE standards) and in the right system. Pat yourself on the back for showing the patience and fortitude to NOT have moved on like most have.
I basically agree with all you said above except for the incorrect spelling of my name.JFever wrote: ↑Thu Oct 11, 2018 9:09 am lol ArrIT.
Do you all remember Brandon Pettigrew? Yuck right? He was a very successful TE prospect, highly drafted, etc. Detriot's system is simply not TE dependent or friendly. Not all systems are. Couple that with another example. How about Chicago. Remind yourself that G.Olsen spent the first part of his career there. He did very little fantasy wise there and wasn't a main piece that their offense utilized. The D.Walker example is good too as he was a roster clogger for several years before V.Davis was moved. It took Z.Ertz some time to get NFL acclimated. I think this is an example of dynasty players not understanding that positions must be looked at differently. We can and should show more patience with Qb, TE, then Wr. Rb's typically don't require as much patience. But.... the TE position often times requires the most patience out of all fantasy relevant positions. RARELY do even highly productive, highly drafted, highly skilled NCAA TE's come into the NFL and tear it up their rookie year.
**** Don't draft TE for need ***** it usually doesn't work.
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Amazon [Bot], Bing [Bot], BlackOmega, Google [Bot], Injury Prone and 73 guests