Ok but why would we compare his stats to the top TEs? We don't expect Corey Davis or Devante Parker to have similar numbers to OBJ or Evans, do we? No, we just hope for WR3 numbers as a rookie. If a rookie WR is startable AT ALL, even as a WR3 or Flex, then that's a big success. So using that logic, yes it's very impressive that Engram has been a mid-level TE1 for most of the year.sloth8u wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:38 amI agree, but it seems like the position in general is getting deeper, and all young. for example....graham is out producing engram. i would bet he does next year, and maybe a few years.....yet noone would think of giving top 50 value for him. understandably with the age gap.Neight wrote: ↑Thu Nov 30, 2017 8:16 am He could be a sell and I understand that logic, but he is also basically a WR that you can plug into your TE slot, there is real value to that. I see potential for him to continue to produce fantasy points equal or better to his current production, and if they bring in a young QB he could really be leaned on at the beginning.
a few years back when graham/gronk were carrying the highest value....there were litteraly no questions or competition for top te's... the pool is much deeper now and really only getting deeper imo.
lets call a spade a spade here....engram is producing closer to the "average te" than he is gronk, graham, kelce, and ertz. thats not saying that he wont get there, but top 5/6 rookie pick?
I do agree he's a sell high tho, because it's not realistic to take his rookie stats and assume he will improve massively from here on out.