Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.
nathanq42
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame
Posts: 4021
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 7:40 am

Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby nathanq42 » Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:24 am

Hi ladies and gents, I think this is a much needed thread.

Watkins was the guy to get from the 2014 class back in the day. Supremely talented, Great hands catcher, fast, shifty, explosive, big play potential on any play. Basically he was supposed to be OBJ before OBJ was OBJ. He played for the Ryan brothers in Buffalo (Yuck) and didn't do much, was hampered by injuries. Now he is in LAR with a up and coming QB, and on a team that is putting up tonnes of points so far.

But Sammy Watkins hasn't done much outside of one huge game. Heck, he has barely gotten any targets!

One questions for the people that have watched the games.

Has Sammy Watkins played better than his box score suggests? Has he been getting open consistently? Does he look as fast as he did in college? Is it a chemistry/game plan issue? Explanation for why the Rams have gone from offensive wasteland to dynamite, but Sammy has been left behind?

And most important of all, is he worth an investment considering he is a FA after this year?

Thank you all in advance!
12 Team 1 ppr .1 points per carry
Garbage
QB Jalen Hurts
RB A-train, D'Onta Foreman,Jahmyr Gibbs, JK Dobbins, Rashaad Penny, AJ Dillon, Jerrick McKinnon, Joshua Kelley, TDP, Chase Edmonds, JRob, Zamir White
WR CeeDee Lamb, Justin Jefferson, DJ Moore, Hollywood Brown, Brandin Cooks, Odell Beckham Junior, Marvin Jones, Braxton Berrios, Richie James
TE Dalton Kincaid, Foster Moreau
+2 Flex
1.02, 1.06

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 14264
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby Cameron Giles » Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:22 am

Watkins looks good. I haven't noticed a change in talent or skill and he seems over the foot issue that plagued him.

Sean McVay's offense isn't exactly a "featured WR" offense. It features everyone. The object is to throw to the first open read, and not necessarily funnel it to someone. The top targets align with that:

Gurley: 25 (6.25 per) - 100 pace
Woods: 22 (5.5 per) - 88 pace
Kupp: 21 (5.25 per) - 84 pace
Watkins: 16 (4.00 per) - 64 pace

Watkins may be getting the short end for now, but I would guess that Gurley's targets come down a little bit. McVay's offense is really good at taking what the defense concedes, creating open space quickly and not being predictable. It's very good at eliminating low percentage passes.

There will definitely be variation for each WR this season, but I am surprised that they made a CLEAR effort to get Tavon Austin involved against Dallas and for the most part ignored Watkins. That's something that isn't typical of what McVay has done so far for the offense. It almost looked like they were trying to showcast Tavon for trade value. Regardless, it was weird.

User avatar
BigBawseRoss
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 11654
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2017 5:56 am

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby BigBawseRoss » Tue Oct 03, 2017 7:10 am

Sammy will eventually speak up about his usage and then he will get fed. if not he will make sure he is somewhere else next season. I think hes still a fine buy and showed week 3 that he still can perform at a high level
team 1
12 team, 1 pt for 4 rec, 0.1 per rush
1qb, 3 rb, 4 wr, te, k, 4 idp
Dak , Herbert
Achane, Breece Hall, KW3Kyren,Ford, Miller, Spiller, z evans, singletary
J Jefferson, Diggs, DK, D Smith Puka, C Watson, E Moore
Njoku , HH, Engram

2024 picks
1,3,4,5,5,6,7 (all late mostly)

team 2
12 team .5ppr
qb, 2 rb, 2 wr, te, flx,flx,
Fields, Dak
Ford,Mixon, Javonte, Mostert, Chubb, Spears
Hopkins, Evans, g Wilson Mingo, shaheed, Jamo
Kelce,McBride, Chig,


1,2,3,3,5

team 3
14 team sf, even scoring idp to offense (rb scores highly too)
Josh Allen, A Rich, Foles, Rudolph
Bijan, Charbs, Spears, Ebner
J Williams, G Wilson, C Watson, Flowers, J Addison, Tillman
Kincaid, Kolar, Ruckert, Fergeson

Kenny Clark, josh allen, jaelen phillips, felix a-u and a bunch of fluff and rookie fliers at idp

User avatar
Servo
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1934
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:17 pm

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby Servo » Tue Oct 03, 2017 7:26 am

I want to say that he is getting open but you should obviously see that LAR is going with the hot-hand approach when it comes to feeding someone...we've seen Woods boom and disappear, Watkins boom and disappear, Kupp boom and disappear.

Right now, the only constant that has remained is Gurley, who looks great this year out of the backfield.

Tough to project but one of the best things that you can ask for is to have players that are a part of a legitimate scoring offense. LA left a lot of points on the table versus Dallas (7 FGs) let us not forget that.

User avatar
Plank
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3934
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 6:01 am

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby Plank » Tue Oct 03, 2017 11:28 am

Nice post Cameron ..

I agree as teams have to worry about Gurley, we should start to see his use increase .. I felt was very promising that Goff just threw it up to him in W3 vs SF. When I see plays like that I get excited because that is how trust is built (I was like hell yes, for Goff and Watkins, for Goff it was that he is willing to trust a WR and throw it in the first place, for Watkins, is that he caught a deep 50/50 ball ..)

In W4, I expected more of an inside game, mainly because I felt the Rams would be worried about Demarcus Lawrence on the RT Havenstein and the outside corners for DAL have actually been playing pretty well, so I felt they would look more inside to Kupp, TE's, and underneath crossers ..

I think with Watkins you have to determine the outside CB play quality of the opposing defense, the strength of the pass rush from the right side (ie, Khalil Mack, Danielle Hunter, Von Miller, forget about it), and the tendency of a team to keep 7 or 8 in the box to stop Gurley ..

So for now, he's a bit of a match-up guy, but as teams commit to stopping Gurley, we should see his use really start to climb, just be patient I say .. evaluate the inside game (passes to RB, TE, and Slot WR) vs the Outside CB's and pass rush ..

There is one play I'm really looking for the Rams and that's a 4 WR set with a back or TE out wide vs zone, matching Watkins inside with a LB with S help .. can't wait for that.. :thumbup:
@PlankMelody

User avatar
mratlanta
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 308
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 11:04 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby mratlanta » Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:07 pm

I think the main issue is that Sammy is still developing chemistry with Goff. He wasn't with him for most of the pre-season and QBs/WRs don't usually instantly click. He's the best receiver on the team by far and the cream always rises to the top. That being said, he's still an injury waiting to happen.
12-team Non-PPR QB, 2-RB, 3-WR, TE, K, DEF
QB: Mahomes, Cam, Tannehill
RB: LeVeon, Jordan Howard, Latavius, Bryce Love, Ty Johnson
WR: OBJ, Antonio Brown, Corey Davis, Robby Anderson, Anthony Miller, Arcega-Whiteside,
Diontae Johnson, Hakeem Butler, DJ Chark, Darius Slayton
TE: OJ Howard, Evan Engram, Gerald Everett
K: Zuerlein
DEF: KC

pvillebiker
Captain
Captain
Posts: 991
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 2:25 pm

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby pvillebiker » Tue Oct 03, 2017 6:10 pm

Great framing of a question on a lot of Sammy investor's minds.

Ignore the week 4 game, as any WR's first week back from concussion should be thrown out. The week 3 breakout is the turn around point for the Sammy / Goff chemistry the way I see it. Remember, Goff is still a young developing QB in spite of the rush to overweight his early season success. As Goff develops, it will increasingly become the Sammy show. It's just too obvious he's their best receiving option. As Goff's ability to get him the ball grows, so will Sammy's production. Now that will take time obviously. More than just this season. However, I fully expect at least something like 70, 1,000, 10 TD's this year. Will probably be more hit or miss, Brandin Cooks style, with an improving floor and the blow ups every 3 or 4 games. Next year will be awesome, assuming health of both Goff & Sammy.

User avatar
saw061600
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6771
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:58 pm

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby saw061600 » Tue Oct 03, 2017 6:15 pm

He looked good in the 2 games I had a chance to watch; think he passes the eyeball test. Maybe more important, offers that are still of the buy-low variety have started to come in where I have shares. That means he's passing the test for other owners too; even after the dud week 4.
10 TM No PPR or waiver 85RST
Herbert Fields Garoppolo Ridder
JT Barkley Etienne Ingram Charb CEH
Evans Aiyuk Dionte Jeudy London JWill GWils EMoore JMyers Mims Moorex2
Andrews Kinkaid Pits Freiermuth
NBosa Quinnen DJJones Clark F-Myers Taylor Graham
Darius Okereke Kendricks DCampbell DJones Baker Kiser Brooks
Adams Simmons Vaccaro Joseph

12 TM .5ppr 45 RST
Herbert Stroud Mayfield
JT Achane Kamara Ford Pacheco Jaleel
AJB DK Godwin Aiyuk Kirk ZJones RMoore Thornton
Hock F-muth
LWilliams Payne Reed Greenard
Bernard Kendricks Warner Baker Williams Tranquil
Budda McKinney Clark Wilson

1-2QB 2-4RB 3-5WR 1-3TE 11OFF/DEF
Herbert Stafford Brock Dobbs
Taylor Jacobs Mattison Kyren Jaleel Ford Bigsby
AJB Diggs Evans Kirk McLaurin Dionte Boyd Renfrow JuJu
Kelce Pitts Deguara
Hutchinson Rousseau Greenard Travon Demarcus
QWilliams EJones TBernard Dean ShaqT Kyzir
Amos Bates Peppers Murray Fitz Clark

Cameron Giles
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 14264
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby Cameron Giles » Tue Oct 03, 2017 6:25 pm

mratlanta wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2017 1:07 pm I think the main issue is that Sammy is still developing chemistry with Goff. He wasn't with him for most of the pre-season and QBs/WRs don't usually instantly click. He's the best receiver on the team by far and the cream always rises to the top. That being said, he's still an injury waiting to happen.
Saw this on Twitter:

"On Higbee's 29-yard reception in 1st Q, pre-snap confusion led Sammy Watkins to streak wide open on opp. side of field. #Cowboys got lucky"

Chemistry is one thing, but Goff definitely needs to grow at reading defenses as well. Sometimes he does have a habit of staring/waiting for the first read to open instead of reading the entire field.

User avatar
Jaguars8907
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 411
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2015 6:08 pm

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby Jaguars8907 » Wed Oct 04, 2017 4:58 am

BigBawseRoss wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2017 7:10 am Sammy will eventually speak up about his usage and then he will get fed. if not he will make sure he is somewhere else next season. I think hes still a fine buy and showed week 3 that he still can perform at a high level
My thoughts exactly
0.5 PPR Scoring - 12 Team - Dynasty Kings
QB [Start 1] RB [1] WR [2] TE [1] FLEX [2] K [1] IDP [3]
2012 Silver
2017 Bronze
2018 Bronze
2019 Silver

Quarterbacks - Lamar Jackson, Philip Rivers, Gardner Minshew II
Running backs - Ezekiel Elliott, David Johnson, James Robinson, Darrell Henderson, Jamal Williams, Matt Breida, Darrel Williams, Frank Gore, Royce Freeman, Tony Pollard
Wide receivers - Odell Beckham, Allen Robinson, Keenan Allen, AJ Green, Denzel Mims, Hunter Renfrow, James Washington, Breshad Perriman
Tight ends - George Kittle, David Njoku, Gerald Everett, Drew Sample
Kickers - Wil Lutz
IDP - Myles Jack, Joe Schobert, Jaylon Smith, Kenneth Murray
Taxi Squad - Laviska Shenault, Devin Duvernay, Anthony McFarland, Deejay Dallas

User avatar
Servo
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1934
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 4:17 pm

Re: Sammy Watkins Eyeball Test

Postby Servo » Wed Oct 04, 2017 10:12 am

Cameron Giles wrote: Tue Oct 03, 2017 6:25 pm Chemistry is one thing, but Goff definitely needs to grow at reading defenses as well. Sometimes he does have a habit of staring/waiting for the first read to open instead of reading the entire field.
I want to say I saw Watkins get really, really open on a few plays in that Cowboys game and Goff may have already looked his way or focused his attention on the opposite side of the field (don't know for certain).


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BradyT and 121 guests