Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
- Hottoddies
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2313
- Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 5:29 pm
Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
If your team is in a rebuilding mode is it okay too roster the worst possible defense and kicker? Or is it, in essence, basically good old fashion tanking? I have never employed this tactic before but I would think it would be a smart ploy if you were looking to land a good draft position. And if it's totally fine how far do you push it? Do you play the weekly match ups? Or is that to far?
"Smart people learn from everything and everyone, average people from their experiences, stupid people already have all the answers." - Socrates
-
- Starter
- Posts: 690
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
First off, don't play with kickers. Second, there is no worst kicker for fantasy, sure there are guys who are great NFL kickers and Justin Tucker can get you like 15+ points a week occasionally but I've seen Chandler Catanzaro get 20+ before so it's pretty much a crap shoot week to week as to how many points you get from a kicker (although, yes, kickers on better offenses are generally in better position to score but it doesnt make much of a difference)Hottoddies wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:10 am If your team is in a rebuilding mode is it okay too roster the worst possible defense and kicker? Or is it, in essence, basically good old fashion tanking? I have never employed this tactic before but I would think it would be a smart ploy if you were looking to land a good draft position. And if it's totally fine how far do you push it? Do you play the weekly match ups? Or is that to far?
As for defense the matchup matters more than the quality of the defense half the time and injuries are more of a factor (you have 11 players to worry about for one fantasy position) so the quality of a defense can change on a dime and that's setting aside special teams plays that can cause a ton of variance week to week (cough, Tyreek Hill/Chiefs DST, cough).
It'll never matter that much which kicker you choose and I don't see any reason to play matchups on defense since that's just gonna reset your waiver priority each week (whether you use FAAB or not), spend that on players you could actual use in a rebuild and if you're team is really that bad (since most rebuilding ones are) I wouldn't worry about it giving you a decent record. Personally I don't think it's tanking because it really won't matter that much over the season.
Greek Mythology League - Heracles - 2QB/3RB/4WR/2TE/2Flex/2DT/2DE/4LB/2CB/2S/1DFlex:
https://www54.myfantasyleague.com/2022/home/13740#1
Marvel vs. DC League - Lords of Order - 1QB/2RB/3WR/1TE/1SFlex/2Flex/1DT/2DE/3LB/1CB/2S/1DFlex:
https://www54.myfantasyleague.com/2022/home/58114#1
https://www54.myfantasyleague.com/2022/home/13740#1
Marvel vs. DC League - Lords of Order - 1QB/2RB/3WR/1TE/1SFlex/2Flex/1DT/2DE/3LB/1CB/2S/1DFlex:
https://www54.myfantasyleague.com/2022/home/58114#1
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
If you are setting your lineup would the intent to lose, that's tanking. So this would be tanking. If there is no rule against it(there should be), then it's acceptable I suppose. But if there's any kinda anti-tanking rule in place, then I would consider it dirty pool.
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
Start your best lineup possible...don't be that guy
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
Should always be rostering the best options for your team. If you happen to trade your best players for draft picks and guys not ready to contribute then so be it but otherwise best lineup rules should apply.
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
Came here to say this.onetwothree wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:31 am Should always be rostering the best options for your team. If you happen to trade your best players for draft picks and guys not ready to contribute then so be it but otherwise best lineup rules should apply.
12 Team IDP. QB:1 / RB:1-3 / WR:2-5 / TE:1-3 / DL:2-4 / LB:2-4 / DB:2-4
QB: Newton, Rivers
RB: Hyde, Gordon, Martin, Dixon, Prosise, Williams (GB), Connor
WR: Beckham, Parker, White, Ty Williams, Doctson, Schuster-Smith, Boyd
TE: Thomas, Howard, Everett
DL: Cox, Fowler, Clark
LB: Alonso, Kendricks, Mack, Hicks, Kirksey, Mercilus, Ray
DB: Ryan, B Jones
Devy: Bryan Edwards
QB: Newton, Rivers
RB: Hyde, Gordon, Martin, Dixon, Prosise, Williams (GB), Connor
WR: Beckham, Parker, White, Ty Williams, Doctson, Schuster-Smith, Boyd
TE: Thomas, Howard, Everett
DL: Cox, Fowler, Clark
LB: Alonso, Kendricks, Mack, Hicks, Kirksey, Mercilus, Ray
DB: Ryan, B Jones
Devy: Bryan Edwards
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
Yeah if you are switching your defense on purpose every week to try and get less points I would consider that tanking. If you only have one defense rosterrd and never switch it, even when their is a defense on the waiver that "has a better matchup", I would not consider that tanking.
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
Totally tanking. But if no rules against it, why not. You're risking reputation and friendships perhaps though.
Last four spots in our league are determined by potential points scored, not season record to stop this*. Also means even if you're in rebuild you still want to set your strongest lineup and play each week
*worst four season records then ordered by potential 'points for' scored in the entire season if they'd set the optimal lineup each week. Wouldn't impact picking up the "worst" K and DST I guess though, and only works as we have big rosters
Last four spots in our league are determined by potential points scored, not season record to stop this*. Also means even if you're in rebuild you still want to set your strongest lineup and play each week
*worst four season records then ordered by potential 'points for' scored in the entire season if they'd set the optimal lineup each week. Wouldn't impact picking up the "worst" K and DST I guess though, and only works as we have big rosters
Dynasty - 9th year, 12-team, Standard scoring, 1QB, 2RB, 2WR, 1TE, 2FLEX, 1K, 1DE/DT, 1LB, 1CB/S - 25man roster / 6 Taxi Squad
'17 Champ, '18 Runner Up, '23 rebuild
QB Watson, A Richardson, O' Connel (TS)
RB Gibbs, Akers, Dillon Carter, Bigsby, Chase Brown, Mcintosh, Tucker, Hull (TS)
WR Metcalf, DJ Moore, Addison, Meyers, Van Jefferson, Collins, Claypool, Mingo (TS), Hyatt (TS), Wilson (TS)
TE Higbee, Freirmuth, Otton (TS)
K Joseph
DE/DT Hunter
LB Franklin Simmons
C/S James
1.01, 1.04
'17 Champ, '18 Runner Up, '23 rebuild
QB Watson, A Richardson, O' Connel (TS)
RB Gibbs, Akers, Dillon Carter, Bigsby, Chase Brown, Mcintosh, Tucker, Hull (TS)
WR Metcalf, DJ Moore, Addison, Meyers, Van Jefferson, Collins, Claypool, Mingo (TS), Hyatt (TS), Wilson (TS)
TE Higbee, Freirmuth, Otton (TS)
K Joseph
DE/DT Hunter
LB Franklin Simmons
C/S James
1.01, 1.04
-
- MVP
- Posts: 2705
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:07 pm
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
Came to this thread to say this. The non-playoff teams in our league are ranked inversely of potential points for the rookie draft for this very purpose - to prevent tanking and having an impact on who makes the playoffs. Highly recommend implementing a rule like that.Pet_Smith wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:56 am Totally tanking. But if no rules against it, why not. You're risking reputation and friendships perhaps though.
Last four spots in our league are determined by potential points scored, not season record to stop this*. Also means even if you're in rebuild you still want to set your strongest lineup and play each week
*worst four season records then ordered by potential 'points for' scored in the entire season if they'd set the optimal lineup each week. Wouldn't impact picking up the "worst" K and DST I guess though, and only works as we have big rosters
Gopher Two
PPR SF, WR & TE Premium (WR 1.2 PPR , TE 1.5 PPR), 10 total starters, 1 QB, 1SF, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Mahomes, Prescott, Mayfield
RB: Hall, Pacheco, Jacobs, Connor, Chubb, Mattison
WR: Tyreek, AJ Brown, Flowers, CSutton, JJeudy, Slayton, Iosivas
TE: McBride, DSchultz, Musgrave, Kraft, MGesicki
2024: 1.02, 2.02
2022 and 2023 League Champ
SafeLeague #1 (12 team, SF, 2.0 PPR TE Prem). 10 total starters 1 QB, 1SF (QB/TE/RB/WR), 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Purdy, Levis, DTR
RB: Pacheco + scrubs
WR: Downs, MMims, EMoore, Jeudy, MWilson + scrubs
TE: Hock, Kincaid, Pitts, Mayer + scrubs
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.11, 2.01, 2.02, 2.06,
2025: 2 1sts, 2 2nds
SafeLeague #2
QB: Purdy, Richardson, Hooker, Willis
RB: literal ZERO RB (for now)
WR: Mingo, MMims, Toney, Skyy, Iosivas
TE: LaPorta, Kincaid, McBride, Mayer, Musgrave, Schoonmaker (and a bunch more 2nd stringers)
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.06, 1.08, 1.09, 1.10, 2.01, 2.05, 2.06
2025: 1 1st, 1 2nd
PPR SF, WR & TE Premium (WR 1.2 PPR , TE 1.5 PPR), 10 total starters, 1 QB, 1SF, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Mahomes, Prescott, Mayfield
RB: Hall, Pacheco, Jacobs, Connor, Chubb, Mattison
WR: Tyreek, AJ Brown, Flowers, CSutton, JJeudy, Slayton, Iosivas
TE: McBride, DSchultz, Musgrave, Kraft, MGesicki
2024: 1.02, 2.02
2022 and 2023 League Champ
SafeLeague #1 (12 team, SF, 2.0 PPR TE Prem). 10 total starters 1 QB, 1SF (QB/TE/RB/WR), 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Purdy, Levis, DTR
RB: Pacheco + scrubs
WR: Downs, MMims, EMoore, Jeudy, MWilson + scrubs
TE: Hock, Kincaid, Pitts, Mayer + scrubs
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.11, 2.01, 2.02, 2.06,
2025: 2 1sts, 2 2nds
SafeLeague #2
QB: Purdy, Richardson, Hooker, Willis
RB: literal ZERO RB (for now)
WR: Mingo, MMims, Toney, Skyy, Iosivas
TE: LaPorta, Kincaid, McBride, Mayer, Musgrave, Schoonmaker (and a bunch more 2nd stringers)
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.06, 1.08, 1.09, 1.10, 2.01, 2.05, 2.06
2025: 1 1st, 1 2nd
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
Doesn't matter what position, you have a responsibility to play to win with your current roster. If you choose to hold a bad Kicker or D on purpose then that is primarily an ethical thing that you need to determine if you're willing to sink to. If you are swapping out for bad players regularly for worse matchups then that is another thing and shouldn't be allowed.
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
I don't agree at all with this. Integrity is critical in this game. There is always an unwritten rule about tanking and owners who do it will have no part in my leagues.
Last edited by skip on Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
If you can't leave at least a 20% tip, you can't afford to eat out.
- Dynasty DeLorean
- Degenerate
- Posts: 8919
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
I agree with this, however is anyone really that concerned with what kicker and defense ppl are starting? So much of that is random anyway. If you're worried about something like that you need to reevaluate thingsgrooner wrote: ↑Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:27 am Yeah if you are switching your defense on purpose every week to try and get less points I would consider that tanking. If you only have one defense rosterrd and never switch it, even when their is a defense on the waiver that "has a better matchup", I would not consider that tanking.
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
I could see if you chose a young kicker over Janikowski for a "rebuild" thinking he might not play next season. That rationale would work at other positions, but at kicker even that is stretching it.
Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?
May not be legally wrong but ethically and morally wrong it is. We had a tanker last year who kept putting Ryan Mathews in week after week when he was injured. The first week I let it slide and didn't say anything because it was a last minute coaching call and owners weren't informed effectively, but by that second week I informed because it definitely ruins a week very quickly and screws over people that are really trying. Some time your team may suck and you just have to deal with it and play to the best of your ability. You are playing against potential friends and/or family so act accordingly. Talk $#@+ to your leaguemates but don't be a douche.... someone might actually have a bad team that deserves the early picks way more to keep a honest and stable league.
14 Team .5 PPR Return yards
QB: Luck, Mayfield
RB: Elliot, Mixon, Guice, Ekeler
WR: Diggs, C. Davis, Gordon, Lockett, M. Williams, Godwin, John Brown, Tre'Quan Smith
TE: Gronk, Burton, Goedert
K: Gostkowski
D/ST: Jax, Chiefs
QB: Luck, Mayfield
RB: Elliot, Mixon, Guice, Ekeler
WR: Diggs, C. Davis, Gordon, Lockett, M. Williams, Godwin, John Brown, Tre'Quan Smith
TE: Gronk, Burton, Goedert
K: Gostkowski
D/ST: Jax, Chiefs
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], PPE82 and 75 guests