Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

General talk about Dynasty Leagues.

Is rostering the worst defense and kicker tanking?

Totally tanking
26
34%
Technically no but bad form
23
30%
No. Legally and ethically fine
27
36%
 
Total votes: 76

User avatar
Hottoddies
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2313
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2014 5:29 pm

Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby Hottoddies » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:10 am

If your team is in a rebuilding mode is it okay too roster the worst possible defense and kicker? Or is it, in essence, basically good old fashion tanking? I have never employed this tactic before but I would think it would be a smart ploy if you were looking to land a good draft position. And if it's totally fine how far do you push it? Do you play the weekly match ups? Or is that to far? :think:
"Smart people learn from everything and everyone, average people from their experiences, stupid people already have all the answers." - Socrates

StableOfRBs
Starter
Starter
Posts: 690
Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 4:29 am

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby StableOfRBs » Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:32 am

Hottoddies wrote: Sat Sep 02, 2017 1:10 am If your team is in a rebuilding mode is it okay too roster the worst possible defense and kicker? Or is it, in essence, basically good old fashion tanking? I have never employed this tactic before but I would think it would be a smart ploy if you were looking to land a good draft position. And if it's totally fine how far do you push it? Do you play the weekly match ups? Or is that to far? :think:
First off, don't play with kickers. Second, there is no worst kicker for fantasy, sure there are guys who are great NFL kickers and Justin Tucker can get you like 15+ points a week occasionally but I've seen Chandler Catanzaro get 20+ before so it's pretty much a crap shoot week to week as to how many points you get from a kicker (although, yes, kickers on better offenses are generally in better position to score but it doesnt make much of a difference)

As for defense the matchup matters more than the quality of the defense half the time and injuries are more of a factor (you have 11 players to worry about for one fantasy position) so the quality of a defense can change on a dime and that's setting aside special teams plays that can cause a ton of variance week to week (cough, Tyreek Hill/Chiefs DST, cough).

It'll never matter that much which kicker you choose and I don't see any reason to play matchups on defense since that's just gonna reset your waiver priority each week (whether you use FAAB or not), spend that on players you could actual use in a rebuild and if you're team is really that bad (since most rebuilding ones are) I wouldn't worry about it giving you a decent record. Personally I don't think it's tanking because it really won't matter that much over the season.
Greek Mythology League - Heracles - 2QB/3RB/4WR/2TE/2Flex/2DT/2DE/4LB/2CB/2S/1DFlex:
https://www54.myfantasyleague.com/2022/home/13740#1

Marvel vs. DC League - Lords of Order - 1QB/2RB/3WR/1TE/1SFlex/2Flex/1DT/2DE/3LB/1CB/2S/1DFlex:
https://www54.myfantasyleague.com/2022/home/58114#1

User avatar
sugbear65
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3848
Joined: Thu May 17, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby sugbear65 » Sat Sep 02, 2017 4:15 am

If you are setting your lineup would the intent to lose, that's tanking. So this would be tanking. If there is no rule against it(there should be), then it's acceptable I suppose. But if there's any kinda anti-tanking rule in place, then I would consider it dirty pool.

lawilt
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1249
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 5:26 pm

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby lawilt » Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:29 am

Start your best lineup possible...don't be that guy

onetwothree
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2016 9:49 am

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby onetwothree » Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:31 am

Should always be rostering the best options for your team. If you happen to trade your best players for draft picks and guys not ready to contribute then so be it but otherwise best lineup rules should apply.

cc texan
Pro Bowler
Pro Bowler
Posts: 1108
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 7:39 am

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby cc texan » Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:04 am

onetwothree wrote: Sat Sep 02, 2017 5:31 am Should always be rostering the best options for your team. If you happen to trade your best players for draft picks and guys not ready to contribute then so be it but otherwise best lineup rules should apply.
Came here to say this.
12 Team IDP. QB:1 / RB:1-3 / WR:2-5 / TE:1-3 / DL:2-4 / LB:2-4 / DB:2-4
QB: Newton, Rivers
RB: Hyde, Gordon, Martin, Dixon, Prosise, Williams (GB), Connor
WR: Beckham, Parker, White, Ty Williams, Doctson, Schuster-Smith, Boyd
TE: Thomas, Howard, Everett
DL: Cox, Fowler, Clark
LB: Alonso, Kendricks, Mack, Hicks, Kirksey, Mercilus, Ray
DB: Ryan, B Jones
Devy: Bryan Edwards

grooner
Player of the Year
Player of the Year
Posts: 2173
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 10:01 am

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby grooner » Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:27 am

Yeah if you are switching your defense on purpose every week to try and get less points I would consider that tanking. If you only have one defense rosterrd and never switch it, even when their is a defense on the waiver that "has a better matchup", I would not consider that tanking.

User avatar
Pet_Smith
Starter
Starter
Posts: 559
Joined: Fri Jun 16, 2017 2:30 am

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby Pet_Smith » Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:56 am

Totally tanking. But if no rules against it, why not. You're risking reputation and friendships perhaps though.

Last four spots in our league are determined by potential points scored, not season record to stop this*. Also means even if you're in rebuild you still want to set your strongest lineup and play each week

*worst four season records then ordered by potential 'points for' scored in the entire season if they'd set the optimal lineup each week. Wouldn't impact picking up the "worst" K and DST I guess though, and only works as we have big rosters
Dynasty - 9th year, 12-team, Standard scoring, 1QB, 2RB, 2WR, 1TE, 2FLEX, 1K, 1DE/DT, 1LB, 1CB/S - 25man roster / 6 Taxi Squad
'17 Champ, '18 Runner Up, '23 rebuild

QB Watson, A Richardson, O' Connel (TS)
RB Gibbs, Akers, Dillon Carter, Bigsby, Chase Brown, Mcintosh, Tucker, Hull (TS)
WR Metcalf, DJ Moore, Addison, Meyers, Van Jefferson, Collins, Claypool, Mingo (TS), Hyatt (TS), Wilson (TS)
TE Higbee, Freirmuth, Otton (TS)
K Joseph
DE/DT Hunter
LB Franklin Simmons
C/S James

1.01, 1.04

Shcritters
MVP
MVP
Posts: 2705
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2014 8:07 pm

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby Shcritters » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:23 am

Pet_Smith wrote: Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:56 am Totally tanking. But if no rules against it, why not. You're risking reputation and friendships perhaps though.

Last four spots in our league are determined by potential points scored, not season record to stop this*. Also means even if you're in rebuild you still want to set your strongest lineup and play each week

*worst four season records then ordered by potential 'points for' scored in the entire season if they'd set the optimal lineup each week. Wouldn't impact picking up the "worst" K and DST I guess though, and only works as we have big rosters
Came to this thread to say this. The non-playoff teams in our league are ranked inversely of potential points for the rookie draft for this very purpose - to prevent tanking and having an impact on who makes the playoffs. Highly recommend implementing a rule like that.
Gopher Two
PPR SF, WR & TE Premium (WR 1.2 PPR , TE 1.5 PPR), 10 total starters, 1 QB, 1SF, 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Mahomes, Prescott, Mayfield
RB: Hall, Pacheco, Jacobs, Connor, Chubb, Mattison
WR: Tyreek, AJ Brown, Flowers, CSutton, JJeudy, Slayton, Iosivas
TE: McBride, DSchultz, Musgrave, Kraft, MGesicki
2024: 1.02, 2.02
2022 and 2023 League Champ

SafeLeague #1 (12 team, SF, 2.0 PPR TE Prem). 10 total starters 1 QB, 1SF (QB/TE/RB/WR), 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 3 Flex
QB: Purdy, Levis, DTR
RB: Pacheco + scrubs
WR: Downs, MMims, EMoore, Jeudy, MWilson + scrubs
TE: Hock, Kincaid, Pitts, Mayer + scrubs
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.11, 2.01, 2.02, 2.06,
2025: 2 1sts, 2 2nds

SafeLeague #2
QB: Purdy, Richardson, Hooker, Willis
RB: literal ZERO RB (for now)
WR: Mingo, MMims, Toney, Skyy, Iosivas
TE: LaPorta, Kincaid, McBride, Mayer, Musgrave, Schoonmaker (and a bunch more 2nd stringers)
2024: 1.01, 1.05, 1.06, 1.08, 1.09, 1.10, 2.01, 2.05, 2.06
2025: 1 1st, 1 2nd

User avatar
FiremanEd
Legend
Legend
Posts: 6854
Joined: Sat Jul 06, 2013 12:51 pm

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby FiremanEd » Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:48 am

Doesn't matter what position, you have a responsibility to play to win with your current roster. If you choose to hold a bad Kicker or D on purpose then that is primarily an ethical thing that you need to determine if you're willing to sink to. If you are swapping out for bad players regularly for worse matchups then that is another thing and shouldn't be allowed.

User avatar
skip
GOAT
GOAT
Posts: 18732
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:35 pm

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby skip » Sat Sep 02, 2017 8:39 am

Pet_Smith wrote: Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:56 am Totally tanking. But if no rules against it, why not.
I don't agree at all with this. Integrity is critical in this game. There is always an unwritten rule about tanking and owners who do it will have no part in my leagues.
Last edited by skip on Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.
If you can't leave at least a 20% tip, you can't afford to eat out.

User avatar
Dynasty DeLorean
Degenerate
Degenerate
Posts: 8919
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 8:45 am

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby Dynasty DeLorean » Sat Sep 02, 2017 8:41 am

grooner wrote: Sat Sep 02, 2017 6:27 am Yeah if you are switching your defense on purpose every week to try and get less points I would consider that tanking. If you only have one defense rosterrd and never switch it, even when their is a defense on the waiver that "has a better matchup", I would not consider that tanking.
I agree with this, however is anyone really that concerned with what kicker and defense ppl are starting? So much of that is random anyway. If you're worried about something like that you need to reevaluate things

User avatar
Tsunami
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1721
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2013 12:46 am

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby Tsunami » Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:10 am

I could see if you chose a young kicker over Janikowski for a "rebuild" thinking he might not play next season. That rationale would work at other positions, but at kicker even that is stretching it.

User avatar
Plank
Ring of Fame
Ring of Fame
Posts: 3934
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 6:01 am

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby Plank » Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:18 am

Allowing tanking drives out good owners ..
@PlankMelody

CK_
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 9:20 pm

Re: Ethical question & poll: Tanking?

Postby CK_ » Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:31 am

May not be legally wrong but ethically and morally wrong it is. We had a tanker last year who kept putting Ryan Mathews in week after week when he was injured. The first week I let it slide and didn't say anything because it was a last minute coaching call and owners weren't informed effectively, but by that second week I informed because it definitely ruins a week very quickly and screws over people that are really trying. Some time your team may suck and you just have to deal with it and play to the best of your ability. You are playing against potential friends and/or family so act accordingly. Talk $#@+ to your leaguemates but don't be a douche.... someone might actually have a bad team that deserves the early picks way more to keep a honest and stable league.
14 Team .5 PPR Return yards
QB: Luck, Mayfield
RB: Elliot, Mixon, Guice, Ekeler
WR: Diggs, C. Davis, Gordon, Lockett, M. Williams, Godwin, John Brown, Tre'Quan Smith
TE: Gronk, Burton, Goedert
K: Gostkowski
D/ST: Jax, Chiefs


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], PPE82 and 75 guests