Collusion is veto worthy
Is this Veto Worthy?
- Never Veto1
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3892
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:26 pm
- Location: Viking Country
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
20 Team Superflex (1/2 PPR / 6pt TD's)
11 Starters - QB 1(2), RB 2(4), WR 2(5), TE 2(3)
QB - Kirk Cousins, Deshaun Watson
RB - Christian McCaffrey, JK Dobbins, Tony Pollard, Jaylen Warren
WR - Odell Beckham, Adam Thielen, Allen Robinson, Donavan Peoples-Jones
TE - Mark Andrews, Jonnu Smith
11 Starters - QB 1(2), RB 2(4), WR 2(5), TE 2(3)
QB - Kirk Cousins, Deshaun Watson
RB - Christian McCaffrey, JK Dobbins, Tony Pollard, Jaylen Warren
WR - Odell Beckham, Adam Thielen, Allen Robinson, Donavan Peoples-Jones
TE - Mark Andrews, Jonnu Smith
- SpartacusPTech
- All Pro
- Posts: 1875
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:06 pm
- Contact:
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
NO WAY!
Only collusion should be vetoed...and if the Commish is telling others not to trade with him, that's a form of collusion IMO. Can't kick the commish out and if he won't replace a bad owner then it's time for you to leave the league.
Only collusion should be vetoed...and if the Commish is telling others not to trade with him, that's a form of collusion IMO. Can't kick the commish out and if he won't replace a bad owner then it's time for you to leave the league.
16 team 1ppr
Jackson, Tua, Bridgewater
Sutton, ARob, Higgins, D. Harris
Barkley, Chubb, McKissic, D. Williams, Felton
Piits, Tonyan, Smith
LB: Wilson, Parsons, Milano, Reddick, Baker, Greenlaw, Walker Jr.
DL: C. Heyward, Flowers, Hunter, Franklin-Myers
DB: Harrison Smith, Abram, Davis III, Bradberry, Maye
Team 2
16 Team 0.5 ppr
QB:Jackson, Mills, Eason, Newton
RB: Barkley/Najee/Gaskin/Hines/Sony/Johnson, Stevenson
WR: Chase/Juju/Aiyuk/Mike Williams/Beasley/N. Harry/Will Fuller/Cephus/D. Brown
TE: Pitts/Knox
DST:49ers, Titans
K: Koo
Team 3 2019 - Champion
12 team SF
Mahomes, Wentz, Jones
Mixon, Lindsay, Drake, Hines, Murray, Carter
Hopkins, M. Williams, Chase, McLaurin, Ridley, Samuel, Washington, Davis, D. Brown
Hockenson, Smith, Cook
Jackson, Tua, Bridgewater
Sutton, ARob, Higgins, D. Harris
Barkley, Chubb, McKissic, D. Williams, Felton
Piits, Tonyan, Smith
LB: Wilson, Parsons, Milano, Reddick, Baker, Greenlaw, Walker Jr.
DL: C. Heyward, Flowers, Hunter, Franklin-Myers
DB: Harrison Smith, Abram, Davis III, Bradberry, Maye
Team 2
16 Team 0.5 ppr
QB:Jackson, Mills, Eason, Newton
RB: Barkley/Najee/Gaskin/Hines/Sony/Johnson, Stevenson
WR: Chase/Juju/Aiyuk/Mike Williams/Beasley/N. Harry/Will Fuller/Cephus/D. Brown
TE: Pitts/Knox
DST:49ers, Titans
K: Koo
Team 3 2019 - Champion
12 team SF
Mahomes, Wentz, Jones
Mixon, Lindsay, Drake, Hines, Murray, Carter
Hopkins, M. Williams, Chase, McLaurin, Ridley, Samuel, Washington, Davis, D. Brown
Hockenson, Smith, Cook
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
This. Commish should not direct free agent moves or trades, but if he has an overmatched owner he also should've acted on it by now.SpartacusPTech wrote: ↑Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:41 am NO WAY!
Only collusion should be vetoed...and if the Commish is telling others not to trade with him, that's a form of collusion IMO. Can't kick the commish out and if he won't replace a bad owner then it's time for you to leave the league.
12-team Non-PPR QB, 2-RB, 3-WR, TE, K, DEF
QB: Herbert, Tanny
RB: Chubb, Stevenson, AJ Dillion
WR: AJ Brown, M Evans, M Williams, D London, C Olave, Jameson Williams, M Thomas
TE: D Njoku
K: Butker
2023: 1.01, 2.01
2024 early first, late first
QB: Herbert, Tanny
RB: Chubb, Stevenson, AJ Dillion
WR: AJ Brown, M Evans, M Williams, D London, C Olave, Jameson Williams, M Thomas
TE: D Njoku
K: Butker
2023: 1.01, 2.01
2024 early first, late first
- heyfeefellskee
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 4060
- Joined: Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:58 am
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
No.
Now I'll go read what the trade is.
Now I'll go read what the trade is.
- GridironGuerilla
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3150
- Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2016 2:43 pm
- Location: Nor-Cal
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
3 pages for a "veto" post? Must be slow lol.
"If on 4th down, the quarterback doesn't complete his pass, they will turn over the ball."
-Booger McFarlland
-Booger McFarlland
- pierson242
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3642
- Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:55 am
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
X2Reljac wrote: ↑Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:47 amThis. Commish should not direct free agent moves or trades, but if he has an overmatched owner he also should've acted on it by now.SpartacusPTech wrote: ↑Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:41 am NO WAY!
Only collusion should be vetoed...and if the Commish is telling others not to trade with him, that's a form of collusion IMO. Can't kick the commish out and if he won't replace a bad owner then it's time for you to leave the league.
Devy Writer and Ranker for DLF
Follow me on Twitter @PiersonFF
Follow me on Twitter @PiersonFF
- clarion contrarion
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 4953
- Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2012 4:11 am
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
collusion does not warrant a veto its warrants extraction ,
once someone shows you who they are , believe them - don't remember who said it but seems accurate !
once someone shows you who they are , believe them - don't remember who said it but seems accurate !
.....this has been a public service announcement from forum superstar clarion contrarion
QB luck- driskell
WR ant brown evans c davis golladay godwin gordon j washington doctson watson lazard patrick henderson
RB mixon cohen chubb aaron jones hunt malcolm brown
TE eifert howard njoku
K tucker DEF pittsburgh chicago
2012 , 2014 2015 2016 2017 & 2018 ACDL Champion 5 IN A ROW 6 in 7 years- now that is dynasty!
2013 ACDL runner up
2013 2014 2017 & 2018 (Undefeated 15-0 ) WORILDS OF HURT CHAMPION
2010 2014 & 2015 7 Rings for Steeltown CHAMPION 2011 & 2013 7 rings runner up
2018 Experts Dynasty League Champion
there is no after football
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
— Leonardo da Vinci
QB luck- driskell
WR ant brown evans c davis golladay godwin gordon j washington doctson watson lazard patrick henderson
RB mixon cohen chubb aaron jones hunt malcolm brown
TE eifert howard njoku
K tucker DEF pittsburgh chicago
2012 , 2014 2015 2016 2017 & 2018 ACDL Champion 5 IN A ROW 6 in 7 years- now that is dynasty!
2013 ACDL runner up
2013 2014 2017 & 2018 (Undefeated 15-0 ) WORILDS OF HURT CHAMPION
2010 2014 & 2015 7 Rings for Steeltown CHAMPION 2011 & 2013 7 rings runner up
2018 Experts Dynasty League Champion
there is no after football
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
— Leonardo da Vinci
- Goirish374
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1396
- Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:31 am
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
Exactly!
It should be cast in bronze at the masthead of the forum for all to bow before upon entry.
Dynasty League Football Premium League Almanac:
2020 Champ: me again! (no, for reals!)
2019 Champ: me!
2018 Champ: Qazxswedcvfrtgbnhyuj
2017 Champ: Irishdoom
2016 Champ: DDT(wakelawyer)
2015 Champ: BigChiefBC
2020 Champ: me again! (no, for reals!)
2019 Champ: me!
2018 Champ: Qazxswedcvfrtgbnhyuj
2017 Champ: Irishdoom
2016 Champ: DDT(wakelawyer)
2015 Champ: BigChiefBC
- Ryantacular
- Player of the Year
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2015 10:15 am
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
Tsunami wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:58 amI don't know why people who have this opinion keep answering these questions. Great for you, don't play in veto leagues, but this isn't helpful advice in regards to this question, for those of us who don't want moron league mates to ruin our league.Ryantacular wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:41 am This wouldn't be veto worthy if the pick was a first. or if it was a 3rd.... Nothing is veto worthy, especially players who's value is based on potential. I would never play in a league that allows vetos.
I don't think any trade for a 2nd round pick is significant enough to veto, unless maybe it's a keeper league (not a full dynasty).
It does help cuz I gave my two cents in the first sentence. I wouldn't give a 3rd round pick personally. But I would also sell for a 1st. So I clearly wouldn't buy for a 2nd, however would easily sell for a 2nd or a 3rd.
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
You need to get a new league...not near veto worthy
22-man, 12-team, 1 pt-PPR; Start 1-2RB; 3-4 WR; 1-2 TE
TEAM 1
QB: Prescott, Foles
RB: Barkley, P Barber, Duke, Gio Bernard, Gus, C Thompson, Breida, Ekeler
WR: A Cooper, Cooks, Lockett, C. Davis, Crowder, Chark, Stills
TE: OJ Howard
TEAM 1
QB: Prescott, Foles
RB: Barkley, P Barber, Duke, Gio Bernard, Gus, C Thompson, Breida, Ekeler
WR: A Cooper, Cooks, Lockett, C. Davis, Crowder, Chark, Stills
TE: OJ Howard
-
- Role Player
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 10:31 am
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
I don't think this is close to veto worthy.
I also don't think this is close for bailing on the league over, or even throwing that big of a stink. Just move on, neither side was that valuable.
I also don't think this is close for bailing on the league over, or even throwing that big of a stink. Just move on, neither side was that valuable.
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
1. Playing in a league with veto's is mehSteelLake wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:23 am Edit (I have to be fair if I want opinions): Another disclosure, just so I'm being entirely honest: there are concerns about the competency of other owner, and I was made aware commissioner texted everyone to not trade with owner anymore. I legitimately never got this text, but I think this is a darn fair deal / if that much of a concern that can't trade with owner, owner should be removed.
2. Why would this owner be allowed if he can't trade with anyone? Find a new league
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1295
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 7:28 pm
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
"commissioner texted everyone to not trade with owner anymore"
Okay, wait a minute here. Has this owner colluded with someone else in the past to justify this response? Or is this just about this owner's perceived "competence"? If it's about collusion, then commish is justified - but if it's about his "competence", that's a whole 'nother matter. The guy should be allowed to run his team as he sees fit. If he runs it into the ground, it's his money.
If the commish is acting in this manner, I'd be looking in the bylaws to see the procedure to remove the commish. This is unacceptable.
Okay, wait a minute here. Has this owner colluded with someone else in the past to justify this response? Or is this just about this owner's perceived "competence"? If it's about collusion, then commish is justified - but if it's about his "competence", that's a whole 'nother matter. The guy should be allowed to run his team as he sees fit. If he runs it into the ground, it's his money.
If the commish is acting in this manner, I'd be looking in the bylaws to see the procedure to remove the commish. This is unacceptable.
PSA - Haggling is NOT the same as negotiating.
-
- Degenerate
- Posts: 8831
- Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 1:47 pm
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
Veto is for collusion or extreme off the charts stupidity that changes the balance of power in the league.
This is neither.
This is neither.
Re: Is this Veto Worthy?
This is spot on.onetwothree wrote: ↑Fri Aug 11, 2017 7:49 am Seems like the issue is not with this deal specifically but a culmination of trades between the 2 same owners. Looks like this is the one that broke camel's back.
I don't know if "veto" is the right word for this situation. Seems more like the league is freezing transactions from 1 owner while they figure out what to do and the owner/OP is just upset he wasn't able to take advantage of 1 more deal. Sounds like this league will be looking for 1 (and maybe 2 owners) shortly...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], cazzie33, Google [Bot] and 36 guests