dm1129 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2017 2:17 pm It seems like every year the fantasy world gets infatuated with new candidates to be a 'Jordan Reed' TE. The reality is having 'Jordan Reed' is as much about coaching and scheme as it is the player. If it was as simple as putting a large WR type player into the TE position, the league would be full of 'Jordan Reeds'. I take Everett because he was hand picked by the coach who was with Jordan Reed from the moment he entered the league. McVay could not be more enthsiastic about what Everett has done both in OTAs as well as training camp and most importantly knows exactly what it takes to make the hybrid WR/TE role a success.
Both of these posts really demonstrate how underrated the talent level of Reed is. I get it, he is not a great athlete who will never be much of a downfield factor. But he is the best TE at creating quick clean separation making for very easy completions plus has very good hands and ball skills which has resulted in a very high catch rate over his career. He was the overall TE1 in PPG each of the last two seasons for PPR leagues despite being used primarily as a decoy in 3 games last season playing with a separated shoulder. Taking those games out, here is what his 16-game average looks like over the games played the last two seasons:ninotoreS wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2017 6:15 pm You know, Reed is a bit overrated, and as such so is McVay in the context of 'he makes move-TEs good' for coaching/producing him. Of course Reed's injury problems have been a factor, but technically Reed has only had one truly great fantasy season so far, and it wasn't even '16. This notion gaining traction lately that McVay is a move-TE whisperer seems premature to me.
102 receptions / 136 targets / 1101 yards / 11 touchdowns. Those are phenomenal numbers for a WR.
Back to the topic at hand. It is Engram by a wide margin for me. Not quite as good after the catch but far better route runner and ball skills.