I don't mind the players seemingly gaming a system I think is inherently stacked against them as currently constructed. I see your point, but at least this is one area where the NFLPA has an advantage. There aren't many of those in the current CBA in my opinion.slaughterrt wrote: ↑Sat Sep 16, 2017 12:17 pm Does anyone else find it ridiculous that players can serve a suspension while he is on IR? It almost seems like he isn't getting any real punishment. I get that he loses his game checks...but it seems like BS to be suspended for games that he wouldn't be active for regardless.
To be fair, I would think that the NFL should only count suspensions towards games where the player would be active for. Seems like a cop out to do it the way they currently do.
Hypothetically, if Zeke gets hurt and put on short term IR ( a la David Johnson), could he not rescind his appeal and serve his suspension during the time he is inactive on IR? Talk about gaming the system.
This opinion isn't born from being a Dixon owner. Just generally how I feel with regard to NFL labor relations these days. Though while the injury to Dixon was disappointing, him being afoul of the PED and now Substances of Abuse policy is downright disheartening. I'm not expecting much moving forward now. Oh well...