Is Hopkins now #1?

[clarion contrarion]

I dont know about Nuk, but is a clear downgrade for Jim Nantz. Sell while you can.

WTH? simms was horrific and always has been anyone is an upgrade to nantz' value and romo prolly will be the shiny star of NFL color guys in a short time.

[Never Veto1]

To me Hopkins value to be a WR1 is completely tied to getting a million targets. He is a solid WR2, whom should have been sold after 2015, and I wish I would have sold then, but I sold this offseason before Romo retired.

[Cowboysfan33]

I dont know about Nuk, but is a clear downgrade for Jim Nantz. Sell while you can.

WTH? simms was horrific and always has been anyone is an upgrade to nantz' value and romo prolly will be the shiny star of NFL color guys in a short time.

.


That's what I was thinking.

[Cowboysfan33]

Hopkins can't have any worse QB situation than he did last season, did anyone watch Osweiler? He was horrible with that slow elongated delivery. It may not be much better with Tom Savage but they still may make a move for a QB but I own Hopkins in two leagues and I'm not bailing on him, it doesn't change much if at all for me.

[slacker]

He had lousy QBs his entire career and did alright with anyone not named Brock. He'll be fine without Romo.

[ELSOUZA]

Interesting views...

[Goddard]

Romo retiring has no impact on my valuation of Nuk. Not sure Romo would have even been an upgrade over Savage, as he hadn't played a meaningful game in over a year, turns 37, and probably wouldn't have stayed healthy all year anyway. So if anyone was relying on Romo to be some sort of Nuk savior, they would have been disappointed (not that Nuk needs a savior). Nuk will be fine and I'll buy him anywhere I can if owners are getting nervous because Romo retired.

[osubuckeyeman]

Just depends on who is behind center. I don't think the value drops that much at this moment.

[lukkynumber13]

Anyone who valued Hopkins higher as a dynasty asset, based on the possibility that an aging Romo might possibly throw to him for a year or 2, and now values Nuk at a lower price, should stop playing dynasty.

[GridironGuerilla]

Anyone who valued Hopkins higher as a dynasty asset, based on the possibility that an aging Romo might possibly throw to him for a year or 2, and now values Nuk at a lower price, should stop playing dynasty.

It's ALMOST a stretch even for redraft thinking.

I've said it before and I'll say it again... the draft can't come fast enough. We're reaching a bit as a community for something to talk about.

[Dynasty DeLorean]

Anyone who valued Hopkins higher as a dynasty asset, based on the possibility that an aging Romo might possibly throw to him for a year or 2, and now values Nuk at a lower price, should stop playing dynasty.

Eh, look at AB without Big Ben. It's certainly something to consider.

[clarion contrarion]

Anyone who valued Hopkins higher as a dynasty asset, based on the possibility that an aging Romo might possibly throw to him for a year or 2, and now values Nuk at a lower price, should stop playing dynasty.

if all the cars are the same speed it can be a boring race !

[motherlode]

I dont know about Nuk, but is a clear downgrade for Jim Nantz. Sell while you can.

WTH? simms was horrific and always has been anyone is an upgrade to nantz' value and romo prolly will be the shiny star of NFL color guys in a short time.

.


That's what I was thinking.

Thats just the rookie fever talking.

[clarion contrarion]

bravo dude ^^^ funny stuff

[ArrylT]

Anyone who valued Hopkins higher as a dynasty asset, based on the possibility that an aging Romo might possibly throw to him for a year or 2, and now values Nuk at a lower price, should stop playing dynasty.

if all the cars are the same speed it can be a boring race !

I think he just dissed Nascar or F1. Not sure which.

I did not move the needle on an assumption that Romo would be Hopkins QB, but I cannot blame others who did. I dont think anyone changed Hopkins from like WR20 to WR5, but I can easily see thinking Romo is Hopkins QB ergo I am going to put him as my WR7 instead of WR8 overall.