In this case, posting years serves no legitimate purpose. I mean we already have to declare years right after winning the player. And why would a 30K salary for 2 years beat 28K for 3 years?OnABloodbuzz wrote: ↑Sun Jun 17, 2018 3:58 pmI would still determine the winner by the yearly amount as we do now, not over complicate things. This would make owners put their cards on the table straight away like you would in a contract negotiation, maybe force owners to think about their roster construction a bit more during FA. If nothing else it takes away a little bit of hassle as you won't have to wait on owners to come back and assign a contract.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest