2016 League Discussion Thread

Moderator: TrueDawg

Multiple Scorgasms
Starter
Starter
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby Multiple Scorgasms » Wed Dec 07, 2016 8:45 am

To my knowledge the only rule is only 1 D with more than 1 year contracts. I will wait for confirmation before making my drops.

citsalp1
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:32 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby citsalp1 » Wed Dec 07, 2016 2:42 pm

Multiple Scorgasms wrote:To my knowledge the only rule is only 1 D with more than 1 year contracts. I will wait for confirmation before making my drops.
Part of the reason we canned the PS squad was due to teams (MYSELF included here,, probably the leader of the pack)Teams would p/u D's store them on the the PS for a certain game, then activacte the PS D, then drop a D on there active roster. I have never seen three active D's on any roster since this league was formed, and I have been here since the formation of the league....I'll never forget I passed on Landian Tomilson for Duece McAliister in the first rookie draft...

Xulu Bak
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 491
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 8:08 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby Xulu Bak » Wed Dec 07, 2016 5:09 pm

Pretty sure the only limitation on defenses is that you can only have one with multiple years assigned.

I actually think I had three, for a week or two, once.

citsalp1
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:32 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby citsalp1 » Wed Dec 07, 2016 9:23 pm

Xulu Bak wrote:Pretty sure the only limitation on defenses is that you can only have one with multiple years assigned.

I actually think I had three, for a week or two, once.
One on the PS two on active roster yes, three on active never.

User avatar
TrueDawg
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1565
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 9:45 am

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby TrueDawg » Wed Dec 07, 2016 10:08 pm

The only rule limiting defenses is having only 1 with a multi-year deal.

If you want to waste additional roster spots on defenses....knock yourself out.

citsalp1
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:32 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby citsalp1 » Wed Dec 07, 2016 11:02 pm

TrueDawg wrote:The only rule limiting defenses is having only 1 with a multi-year deal.

If you want to waste additional roster spots on defenses....knock yourself out.

I don't remember it like that...but so be it

Multiple Scorgasms
Starter
Starter
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby Multiple Scorgasms » Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:48 am

And Dr got Cobb too?

Jesus Christ. When does it end. :lol: :lol:

citsalp1
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:32 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby citsalp1 » Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:04 pm

Multiple Scorgasms wrote:And Dr got Cobb too?

Jesus Christ. When does it end. :lol: :lol:
You would actually start Cobb? There are better WW wr's, well no, but Cobb is the ultimate 2 pts, or 20 pts WR...

citsalp1
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:32 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby citsalp1 » Thu Dec 08, 2016 6:06 pm

Kelce needs to find the endzone...twice.

Multiple Scorgasms
Starter
Starter
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby Multiple Scorgasms » Thu Dec 08, 2016 7:49 pm

In terms of pure football explosiveness, I would put Tyreek Hill up against any player I've seen in the last 15 years.

citsalp1
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:32 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby citsalp1 » Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:34 pm

Multiple Scorgasms wrote:In terms of pure football explosiveness, I would put Tyreek Hill up against any player I've seen in the last 15 years.
I didn't think you watched football? Just stats, and an occasional game?

User avatar
TrueDawg
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1565
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 9:45 am

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby TrueDawg » Thu Dec 08, 2016 8:52 pm

Multiple Scorgasms wrote:In terms of pure football explosiveness, I would put Tyreek Hill up against any player I've seen in the last 15 years.
He's quite a weapon...we'll see if he can keep it up as teams get more tape on him.

User avatar
TrueDawg
All Pro
All Pro
Posts: 1565
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 9:45 am

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby TrueDawg » Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:00 pm

LOL, for you MS....

Warning...NSFW

http://dailysnark.com/tyreekhillnsfw/

citsalp1
Role Player
Role Player
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 10:32 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby citsalp1 » Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:06 pm

LOL a weapon :D he is

Multiple Scorgasms
Starter
Starter
Posts: 702
Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm

Re: 2016 League Discussion Thread

Postby Multiple Scorgasms » Thu Dec 08, 2016 9:09 pm

citsalp1 wrote:
Multiple Scorgasms wrote:In terms of pure football explosiveness, I would put Tyreek Hill up against any player I've seen in the last 15 years.
I didn't think you watched football? Just stats, and an occasional game?
Still watch Red Zone every Sunday. Just about never tune in for full games. I would've for this but my internet has decided to act like we're in 1999.


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: jimscafs25 and 2 guests