I don't see how, no place to put them...but I'm cool to see what happens.TrueDawg wrote:I think it's going to be the opposite...guys that might normally be on a roster or PS are going to be FAs instead.citsalp1 wrote:The PS sqaud was a turnstile for player's , this will be the most boring year ever regarding player movement.
2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
Moderator: TrueDawg
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
- jimscafs25
- Starter
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:54 pm
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
I agree with this. If anything there will be more movement.TrueDawg wrote:I think it's going to be the opposite...guys that might normally be on a roster or PS are going to be FAs instead.citsalp1 wrote:The PS sqaud was a turnstile for player's , this will be the most boring year ever regarding player movement.
- jimscafs25
- Starter
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:54 pm
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
We expanded the actual roster. There's an extra space to stash players now. Practice squad was simply a loophole machine.citsalp1 wrote:I don't see how, no place to put them...but I'm cool to see what happens.TrueDawg wrote:I think it's going to be the opposite...guys that might normally be on a roster or PS are going to be FAs instead.citsalp1 wrote:The PS sqaud was a turnstile for player's , this will be the most boring year ever regarding player movement.
I just don't see the problem here. There is 10 bench spots at everyone's disposal. Honestly, if somebody can't strategize how to use 10 bench spots, then they don't belong in this type of a league. If somebody wants to use that space on an extra D or Kicker, its on them. If they want to use those spots for more veterans to make a run this year, that's on them. If they want to keep more younger players, and play for the future, its on them.
The more we expand the roster, the less movement that takes place and the easier this league gets. To me, that's much less fun.
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
Look...the practice squad was barely a step up from free agency. While PS players were technically "on" your roster, you couldn't do anything with them without promoting them to the active roster. And since PS players are subject to bidding by other teams (just like free agency), it was not really an effective place to "stash" young players. Cuz the second they show anything on the field, some other owner is bidding on them. So it was essentially a place to carry players that nobody wants.
To me, there's very little difference between promoting a player from PS and simply signing a FA (other than the loopholes created by the PS). Either way, you have to have an available active roster spot, and we've actually EXPANDED the roster.
To me, there's very little difference between promoting a player from PS and simply signing a FA (other than the loopholes created by the PS). Either way, you have to have an available active roster spot, and we've actually EXPANDED the roster.
-
- All Pro
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
The easier the league gets ... for GOOD owners.
Any good owner would want more roster spots. The others want kickers, defenses and waiver wires to increase the variance (luck).
Any good owner would want more roster spots. The others want kickers, defenses and waiver wires to increase the variance (luck).
- jimscafs25
- Starter
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:54 pm
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
Or maybe "pussies" that are too scared to cut the wrong guy...Multiple Scorgasms wrote:The easier the league gets ... for GOOD owners.
Any good owner would want more roster spots. The others want kickers, defenses and waiver wires to increase the variance (luck).
-
- All Pro
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:18 pm
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
Of course. It's a lot easier to cut the wrong guy when actually have quality 1 thru 19 and don't rely on waivers and random no-name 5th stringers.
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
He Hate Me is over the roster limit...24 hours to resolve.
- jimscafs25
- Starter
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:54 pm
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
Just for clarification, players listed on the pup are not eligible for the IR, correct?
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
To my knowledge you can't put players on pup on it...there probably 500 players on pup
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
The rule is pretty clear...jimscafs25 wrote:Just for clarification, players listed on the pup are not eligible for the IR, correct?
If a player is officially suspended, placed on IR or retires from the NFL, you can put him in one of the three IR slots.
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
Cut HeuermanTrueDawg wrote:He Hate Me is over the roster limit...24 hours to resolve.
- jimscafs25
- Starter
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2015 2:54 pm
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
That's what I thought. Sorry Thunder, but I believe Jordy and Perelman are ineligible.TrueDawg wrote:The rule is pretty clear...jimscafs25 wrote:Just for clarification, players listed on the pup are not eligible for the IR, correct?
If a player is officially suspended, placed on IR or retires from the NFL, you can put him in one of the three IR slots.
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
Show Me The Money is over the roster limit...24 hours to resolve
Re: 2016 - Illegal Roster Thread
Illegal roster not resolved...$1,000 penalty assessedTrueDawg wrote:Show Me The Money is over the roster limit...24 hours to resolve
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests