2017 Rule Change Discussion - Pre-Vote
Moderators: TrueDawg, monkeybones, Dionosys
Re: 2017 Rule Change Discussion - Pre-Vote
I wouldn't be opposed, just not sure that it's really necessary.
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 2:32 pm
Re: 2017 Rule Change Discussion - Pre-Vote
Follow the same rules as in-season. Can't touch a guy you've cut unless x amount of time has passed without someone else nominating him.
-
- Captain
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2015 7:46 am
- Location: Michigan
Re: 2017 Rule Change Discussion - Pre-Vote
I completely agree with this reasoning.Dionosys wrote: ↑Tue Jun 06, 2017 8:09 pm 1. I agree we need stiffer penalties regarding roster churning however I'm against bid limits on amount of players or value of salary cap. That is something that each individual team needs to monitor and be comfortable with for themselves.
I also feel that 100% cap penalty is too much though and I would say double that of the normal cap penalty to 40% is much more fair.
2. I personally feel that the DS set up is working well as it is.
3. Contract years I'm fine with a set date or 24 hours after the bid has been won. That alone may reduce/eliminate issues from roster churning.
4 I've been on the wrong side of this and have had a player who had a good game get put to the bench but my feelings are that if they were in your lineup when the game was played then you take the points that player received, good or bad.
- monkeybones
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3396
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 2:16 pm
Re: 2017 Rule Change Discussion - Pre-Vote
There is a rule for in season cuts:OnABloodbuzz wrote: ↑Wed Jun 14, 2017 3:17 pm Follow the same rules as in-season. Can't touch a guy you've cut unless x amount of time has passed without someone else nominating him.
All players released during the season must first clear waivers before becoming free agents. The waiver process is similar to the free agency bidding process except it ends 48 hours after the player is released. Any owner interested in a released player can start a bidding thread on the league message board. Once bidding begins this player is treated just like an UFA in the off-season with bidding ending after 48 hours passes after the last bid. The owner releasing a player, however, is unable to bid on that player during the waiver process. If no bids are placed on a player that player is again designated a free agent, and the original owner can again acquire the player as a free agent.
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 2:32 pm
Re: 2017 Rule Change Discussion - Pre-Vote
Yeah, I'm saying to follow that same or similar process during the off season. If a bidding process is started within 48 hours, the releasing owner can't bid.
It eliminates the attempted manipulation in the scenario you laid out and it's a process everyone is familiar with.
If a player is worth anything someone will put a bid in and rule the releasing owner out of the running. Someone might get a bargain but it won't be the original owner.
- monkeybones
- Ring of Fame
- Posts: 3396
- Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 2:16 pm
Re: 2017 Rule Change Discussion - Pre-Vote
That's already in the rules. The owner releasing a player is unable to bid on that player during the waiver process.OnABloodbuzz wrote: ↑Thu Jun 15, 2017 3:34 pmYeah, I'm saying to follow that same or similar process during the off season. If a bidding process is started within 48 hours, the releasing owner can't bid.
It eliminates the attempted manipulation in the scenario you laid out and it's a process everyone is familiar with.
If a player is worth anything someone will put a bid in and rule the releasing owner out of the running. Someone might get a bargain but it won't be the original owner.
-
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 1231
- Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 2:32 pm
Re: 2017 Rule Change Discussion - Pre-Vote
So is the regular season rule the same in the off season?
Re: 2017 Rule Change Discussion - Pre-Vote
I'm the new guy so I'll only vote on the one thing I am sure of.
If an owner does not start a Thursday night player before kickoff on Thursday then that player should be blocked.
If an owner does not start a Thursday night player before kickoff on Thursday then that player should be blocked.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests