Dynasty League Football Forum

If you like it, that's all that matters. I think it's too early to bail on a guy you spent 1.03 on. It's not like this is a Sankey situation where his talent was marginal and people pushed him as high as 1.03 because of situation and need at RB. I think the odds of Treadwell panning out are higher ...

I disagree with allen having higher injury risk than Gronk. Gronk has also torn his acl and had ongoing back issues with multiple surgeries. Once allen is 100% back from his acl, there shouldn't be any ongoing chronic concerns. As for the deal, I agree that you would be giving too much. I see Allen...

Keep the pick. Last thing you want to do is trade it for 2.02 then the pick end up Top 3 & you miss out on Saquon Barkley, Darrius Grice or Bo Scarborough. Looking at your team I can definitely see a top 3-4 draft pick in 2018. If anything you should start the season & look to package it fo...

I'd be comfortable moving Moncrief and the 3rd pick for the 1. I'm not sure if Dalv or Lenny are going to be like Zeke or not but that shouldn't stop you from making the move based on your roster.

Better QB situation: Alshon
Age: Alshon
Talent: Wash (debatable but close enough)
Cost to acquire: Alshon more than DT

I'd say Alshon if you're looking for upside, DT if for the better price. It seems common to find a DT owner looking to bail on him, best of luck in having the same!

I voted for the package but only because it's not me who owns OBJ. The value is there but I certainly do not blame you if you don't want to do it.

Bruiser wrote: ↑Fri Apr 14, 2017 3:36 am In the Colts scheme, I like Chris Wormley at 5-tech. Big athletic guy that just needs coached up. He could be a beast!

I like how this went from a Buckeye to a Wolverine...

That said, having watched Wormley enough, I agree that he could be a monster if coached up right.

I'd say since the majority says his value is a 2nd, shoot for a late first. Be willing to settle on a 2nd if you're okay dealing him, but I'd be willing to bet somebody in your league likes him enough to give a late first.

Jamie makes it sway a little bit for me. Easier to find an elite DB and even easier to stream matchup corners each week. Give me the elite LB as opposed to a questionable depth guy.

As a Tree owner I wouldn't even consider that but my league is setup quite a bit different. If (Darron or Sean)Lee, DVC, and Kirksey are your only other LBs I'd probably shy away.

Keep in mind that dealing one of your less attractive assets (Jordy will be 32 next month) will obviously result in a lower return. I'd aim higher if it was my team and deal Cooks. He's overvalued right now (great for sellers) and you have insane depth at that position. That's not to say Cooks isn'...

I'd rather take the WR, pick and an open roster space for this season than 2 bench guys you can't really start. There's a better chance of Anderson starting than the RBs. Even if they do play, they'll cancel each other out and you'll drive yourself nuts trying to figure out which one to start. The ...

Coogan Football wrote: ↑Thu Apr 13, 2017 2:13 pm RBs hands down IMO.

Lynch doesn't change much for me


Ps kudos to you for coming on here and being active as one of the newer members, keep it up

I appreciate it! DLF won me over from FBG this offseason.

If he doesn't want QB in return then he may consider but I just don't see a Winston owner dealing for a handcuff, aged WR, and a LB2.

As a Nuk owner I'd be awfully tempted to accept the offer that included the 18 1st... and I don't even admire picks like most do. Also as a Nuk owner, I can see where I would need something like that to make me want the downgrade to DPark.