Dynasty League Football Forum

Honestly I agree with some of the others in saying that I would hold Hopkins for now. He’s still got a big enough of a production window that you can hopefully rebuild and improve your team around him. I’d wait until mid season and hopefully some of your older/more role player type guys gain value ...

I like what your WR core looks like, but you had Adams, Beckham, and Evans already. You turned over the lower half of it for prospects that have more of a chance of hitting, but I don't know if swapping out Allen for Diggs is a huge upgrade. You subtracted Fournette and added Gurley, so I agree I'd ...

Mahomes Thomas Mike Williams Sutton Kirk I like this list, but would think seriously about keeping Edelman over Kirk or this year. Kirk is in a good position, but would he elevate to the level of 8th round next year. That would be the only reason to keep him over the production you'll get from Edel...

Pats/VikesFan wrote: ↑Wed May 29, 2019 6:07 am To have the immediate impact on your team, Harry and Montgomery.

While I agree Montgomery will have the immediate impact, I voted with Sanders. I believe he develops into the more solid all around back of the two.

A 6th is a hefty price to pay to move up 14 spots (assuming 12-team). If you had a target at 2.11, I could see giving up 8.03 for the move.

This does sound like too many moving parts to the plan. I would nab Sanders/Montgomery at 1.03 and call it a day.

You would have to have some faith in Jackson. I own shares of both RBs. In a SF, I think the gap between Mixon and Barkley is more than covered by Jackson and Kupp. You just have to like the pieces you're getting back and expect them all to contribute. Don't forget to factor in the value of the play...

I like the idea of Henry and Robinson. Is trying to add Mixon going to end up leaving me too short depth-wise? I'm targeting Mixon because he's young and I see his value increasing over the next year or two. That said, I don't want to be stuck at RB in this start 2.

For Wasteland, the Mixon owner is a Bengals fan and my brother-in-law. He earned the 1.01 this year and could use young pieces to rebuild. I want to make a fair offer without overpaying too much. I know he wants WRs (he took Harry first), but I think any package would have to contain a RB as well. I...

If an upgrade trade doesn't work out, I'd consider trading one or two of those 2019 1sts to nab a couple more 1sts for 2020. With the supposed longer list of stud prospects, it would add your talent stocking endeavor.

I voted for the Nuk side, but I think it’s pretty hilarious how many people on both sides seem to know with absolute certainty what will happen with these three players over the next 2-3 years. Did K-Mart have a blue light special on crystal balls that I missed out on? The only certainty is that th...

The fact that Sanders tested better overall than Jacobs would have me going Jacobs Sanders, if my team needed the RB infusion. I could see going with Harry if my team needed Wrs.

I agree he should be worth more. For reference, LVE finished as the 5th LB with 212.5 pts. (scoring balanced to keep IDP at least competitive with OFF), while Engram finished as the 13th TE with 103.8 pts. in .5 PPR, but I see an uptick in scoring like we did every game OBJ was out. The obstacle is ...

For Panthers, I have 3 good options at TE with one waiting in the wings. I opened up the option of trading one to the league. I got an intriguing idea concerning LVE, but I'm not sure how to compare them. We don't have rankings that mix offensive and defensive players on the same board. How would yo...

I agree you should get what you can now. That 3.05 could be traded for a 2020 2nd OTC during your draft. There usually is no shortage of guys that want to trade back in to get someone who's fallen.