Dynasty League Football Forum

Just put it to a league vote. The justification can go either way, but the rules should not be that fuzzy. As a commissioner I never like to "punish" league members because I didn't format/present the rules in the proper way. If he really said that the rule should be worded in a different...

Exact wording is below. There is no language re free agents and all free agent pickups are only for the same league year. 1. If a player performs w/I a designated ‘performance metric’ relative to other players at his position w/i one of the last 2 league years of his contract, he will be required t...

I don’t understand how in gods name the cardinals can take a WR. Their defense is bad and their O line is bad. If they take a WR in the 1st round they should just quit being an NFL franchise. Just needed to get that off my chest. Thanks for listening. Kyler is already quoted as saying that if it wa...

Yeah, probably 90% of the mocks that I look at on a daily basis have the Raiders taking Jeudy, definitely makes sense. The only team that drafts earlier, that I see taking him, in mocks, is the Cardinals at #8 but it seems like Lamb would make more sense there, with the K.Murray connection, assumin...

I just traded 1.3 and 1.6 for Zeke and a 2021 2nd (top 50%) Rookie fever is huge right now lol well this has to have the OP feeling like he’s on the right track. It’s always nice to have your theory proven right, rookie fever is high. As to the pick, your best bet maybe trying a multiple slide down...

We all get rookie fever, but this year is probably the most anticipated rookie class since I started dynasty. I lost in the finals last year and have a loaded roster but made a trade mid season that scored me 1.04. As much as I’ll love my options at 1.04 I think I could get the mother load trading ...

We all get rookie fever, but this year is probably the most anticipated rookie class since I started dynasty. I lost in the finals last year and have a loaded roster but made a trade mid season that scored me 1.04. As much as I’ll love my options at 1.04 I think I could get the mother load trading b...

Edit because someone already mentioned it: I’m keeping my ear to the ground to see who the Colts are targeting at QB. If it’s someone like Rivers I would have to think he gets a substantial boost in value due to his willingness to to target his RBs.

I’m in an IDP league with 6 rounds of rookie picks so maybe slightly skewed but if I was trading for him I would give a late 3rd. FWIW I don’t buy guys who I have to wait on for playing time unless I was in a complete rebuild.

Yeah to be completely honest at this point you should be buying 21 1sts not trying to move up in the 2020 1st round- it’s just too difficult. This is my strategy. I’m in a contract league so I’ll be looking to trade some studs on the last year of their contracts because I have depth to get 2020 2nd...

If you asked me right now and I owned 1.1 I’d consider moving it for 1.5, 1.10, and 2.5 but I definitely wouldn’t tell you that because I’m pretty sure I could get a little more than that. Pre NFL draft I would be happy with the top 6 players especially if I’m getting multiple other early picks in t...

I just really needed to come here to vent about KA falling over his f*cking feet at the half yard line. Basically a -12 play for me starting Rivers. I’m up 25 playing D. Adams and Hunter (DE) Monday night. Not good.

Luckily for owners he’s still produced, but if you watch the games in conjunction with the volume you realize why some pessimism is warranted.

It's not that he's terrible - but his production is more scheme related than talent related and he cannot reliably be thought of as a WR1. The Rams as a whole have been figured out and he's hard to trust as more than a backend WR2/WR3. This. Why does everyone assume everything is so binary? He’s ha...

I’m just back to announce I have changed my mind on Kupp. I don’t trust him now, and I won’t be trusting him as a long term dynasty asset given what I’ve seen the past few weeks. RIP

I was wrong.