Dynasty League Football Forum

i'd much rather keep pitts over a random 1st in a 1QB league two years from now. From MY side I assume you think that would be a good deal? This guy, I always manage to make good trades with him, where I feel like I win most of the time. I have a feeling with LaPorta on board he may take the offer ...

ok then. since you only picked the van jefferson part of my comment, might as well touch on the other two more important (as evidenced by being earlier in the paragraph) points, namely: - it's hard to determine to what point it's the coach and to what point is the player. - there are very very few W...

i'd much rather keep pitts over a random 1st in a 1QB league two years from now.

i don't think anyone is debating whether mcvay is good or not really. Well, that's also not the point. But, yeah. looked to me like it was beginning to be, but i must be mistaken... If not turning Van Jefferson into a good WR is the biggest knock, then that's nothing. McVay has clearly elevated som...

Isn't Rodriquez below Ekeler and BRob? Give me the Deuce if you want someone who stands a chance at RB. the 5'5" guy with a 5th percentile speed score and 1.7 ypc and still 3rd on the depth chart? yeah, no, i prefer the guy that can score two TDs if the starter goes down. I was thinking only Z...

after benson, back-end of round 1 in SF or anywhere after 1.05 in 1 QB.

i don't think anyone is debating whether mcvay is good or not really.

Bellinger and Rodriguez Isn't Rodriquez below Ekeler and BRob? Give me the Deuce if you want someone who stands a chance at RB. the 5'5" guy with a 5th percentile speed score and 1.7 ypc and still 3rd on the depth chart? yeah, no, i prefer the guy that can score two TDs if the starter goes down.

if smith doesn't start for you, pickens won't either. pacheco may be better than zamir or spears, but still likely the RB4 on your team, so still on the bench. i like pitts as a buy as of now, but having laporta and no TE premium he ain't starting either. likewise for 1.05, even though i understand ...

kellysheroes wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 6:32 pm but Gibbs has about 6 years of elite production

whoa! that looks like a bit of an overstatement.

FiremanEd wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 5:05 pm

TheTroll wrote: ↑Mon May 20, 2024 2:47 pm Miller is an early 2nd or late first right now

This must be 1QB price, because he’s closer to late 2/early 3 in SF, and probably more 3rd than 2nd.

not for me. not interested in giving him away for the likes of corley/wright/roman wilson.

if i was offered both picks, i'd decline.

I wouldn't do it either. It's a philosophy thing - I don't want roster the top tier of RBs in dynasty. The value/volatility are too much for me. Bijan might be the exception to the rule but who knows. History says if you're not CMC, you're risky. Ask the Najee managers. It's hard to remember how &q...

Anteaters wrote: ↑Tue May 21, 2024 7:22 am And he already has three NFL TE1s on his roster.

woods and gesicki are TE1s on their rosters? that's news to me. it could happen, but it's really far from guaranteed.

Conventional might be the wrong word. But, in the sense that you can't just line these players up at the X and get comparable results anywhere else. gotcha. hard to know where the line between player's skill and system is though. and players that can be lined up as the X and get comparable results ...

i'd re-roll on early day 3 WRs...