Dynasty League Football Forum

Great return for Chubb there.

The more strange thing for me is just that pretty much every RB got faster when the official came out. That has never happened and this is really wonky.
I guess the NFL draft will tell us how much teams believed it.

I'm not sure anyone was saying take Chubb over Javonte in dynasty, just that he's a much better NFL RB. Obviously the age has to factor in quite a bit. If you think the age premium on Javonte or age discount on Chubb is a little much in this situation, it presents a good buying opportunity, because ...

Chubb is much better than Javonte and y’all will see that soon enough I'm with you. Chubb is a better RB and doesn't really get his due because it just hasn't translated to fantasy points. I also think he'll age well given his work ethic, low mileage, and that he seems to pick his spots to be physi...

I fully support selling Carter with such shallow skill position requirements, but I wouldn't be that worried about a QB upgrade. Better to use those assets for an elite TE or a WR upgrade IMO.

I've got a rebuilding team and I'm in talks with someone about a DK/Diontae swap. We'd originally been discussing DK/Ryan/White for DJ/1.12/Cephus. He said we were close, but ultimately decided not to pursue Ryan/White and asked what a DK/Diontae swap would look like? I value them pretty much equal...

I have to think that if ETN or Akers (or Dobbins for that matter) managers were keen on selling these guys, it would have happened last season. Those guys don't really jump out as buy lows for me, in general. Maybe Johnny Cocktail is right that they haven't seen their value bump yet, but I feel like...

Shoot, even my teams on bye are losers this week (Godwin, Fournette, Evans, Mixon injuries).

It's looking like I need to find a new hobby

That's pretty much Taylor for Cook, imo. Wentz is at least worth the 1st, and the Carolina QBs don't really factor in. Smash accept for me.

It's wild seeing how much the goal posts have moved in this thread. The original statement is already proven false. No one that took Pitts high regrets it. The bad process was looking too much through the position lens, and less through the prospect lens, imo. If you made any sort of judgement about...

The requirements to play RB and at a high level, and to take on the level of physical endurance is much different for that position than WR with E Sanders’ downfield, much less physical playing style. I would love to see some actual data to back this stance up. I've seen it repeated a lot, but I do...

Smash accept for Pitts IMO.

If Emmanual Sanders can look as good as new 7 months post Achilles tear at 32 years old, I like Akers chances. I've always thought it was more likely than not he fully recovers given how many success stories there are for Achilles recoveries across major athletics the last couple years.

I like both guys. I think if not competing, I'll take Gainwell to avoid the long term Shannahanigans at RB. If competing, Mitchell's role this year swings it in his favor.