Dynasty League Football Forum

To answer your question the max I could keep lamb would be this yr, and then 5 more max. A draft pick I could keep max 12 yrs potentially 💁‍♂️ And cost of contracts? The $ would not be a huge factor is this league. Lamb is currently at $76, franchising him would put him at about $100 which would be...

Ski mask ready wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 8:56 am

moishetreats wrote: ↑Fri Apr 26, 2024 7:37 am Really can't answer this without more details about the contract setup for the league.

To answer your question the max I could keep lamb would be this yr, and then 5 more max.

A draft pick I could keep max 12 yrs potentially

And cost of contracts?

Ahhh.... then, yes, a much more frustrating turn of events! (Though I always thought Nabers to the Chargers was less likely than Alt. Look at how they're constructing their team, and look at the WRs still available.)

And still frustrating!! Nabers (or Bowers) would have been really exciting there.

Agreeing with the above.

Pre-draft, a team thinking that Odunze was the missing piece to a 2024 championship was probably off on their thinking.

In a rebuild: always for value. Always. On a competitive team: almost, always for value. Rare exceptions. Now, whether or not Odunze or Bowers is better value, that I'm not sure. But I would not let need play into it at all. Quick thought exercise: Say you think Odunze is more valuable than Nabers. ...

Really can't answer this without more details about the contract setup for the league.

Fair on value. ESPECIALLY if you're not sold on Odunze. If you think Odunze is legit, though, then I wouldn't do this. I think I'd try to keep one of the 2nds out, though.

Is this for Team 1 in sig? Then I wouldn't worry about it all. You're probably playing more for 2025 -- I don't think Nabers or Odunze in the ideal spots would still be enough for your WR corps in 2024. And I think they'll be as expected in 2025+.

I'm easily making this deal.

Trading down from 1.07 to 2.01 this year to trade up from a probable mid-late 1st to a probable 1.01-1.03 next year? Absolutely. (Yes, I get the risk. Fine. I'm willing to take the shot anyway.)

I can't see any reason to do this deal except simply to say you have the top 3 RBs. Other than that, there's nothing that appeals to me about this.

Purdy looks legit. Young might be a buy, but he's not someone I would trust. At some value, I'd look to get him / hold him in case I'm wrong, but I moving up to Purdy is HUGE, IMO. And the drop from 1.03 to 1.07 isn't nearly as big: you're still getting a top-tier player at 1.07. Put another way: of...

1QB so I doubt Caleb is in the plans, but I agree to hold for more With his WR depth and the lack of value in this years RB class, with only an aging QB, you got to plan for the future and take Caleb imo… idc if he has a donkey as his starting qb, he goes with marvin harrison at 1.1 and sleeps easy...

I think I'm taking this (though I'd love to replace 1.12 with the other person's 1st in 2025). I think the gap between Allen and the next tier of QBs has shrunk. Don't get me wrong: Allen's still in that top tier. But the next couple of tiers have moved up. I know the axiom of always getting the bes...

I would 100% take Waddle.

I'm holding (though I get why you'd make the trade). If you LOVE WR2 in this draft, then go ahead. But I think Olave's a legit WR, and the WR you get at 1.03 would have to be elite to be a tier-up. And 1.08 is a value pick. Heck, WR3 might even be there at 1.08... So it's fine if you're lower on Ola...