Dynasty League Football Forum

Is this for Team 1 in sig? Then I wouldn't worry about it all. You're probably playing more for 2025 -- I don't think Nabers or Odunze in the ideal spots would still be enough for your WR corps in 2024. And I think they'll be as expected in 2025+.

I'm easily making this deal.

Trading down from 1.07 to 2.01 this year to trade up from a probable mid-late 1st to a probable 1.01-1.03 next year? Absolutely. (Yes, I get the risk. Fine. I'm willing to take the shot anyway.)

I can't see any reason to do this deal except simply to say you have the top 3 RBs. Other than that, there's nothing that appeals to me about this.

Purdy looks legit. Young might be a buy, but he's not someone I would trust. At some value, I'd look to get him / hold him in case I'm wrong, but I moving up to Purdy is HUGE, IMO. And the drop from 1.03 to 1.07 isn't nearly as big: you're still getting a top-tier player at 1.07. Put another way: of...

1QB so I doubt Caleb is in the plans, but I agree to hold for more With his WR depth and the lack of value in this years RB class, with only an aging QB, you got to plan for the future and take Caleb imo… idc if he has a donkey as his starting qb, he goes with marvin harrison at 1.1 and sleeps easy...

I think I'm taking this (though I'd love to replace 1.12 with the other person's 1st in 2025). I think the gap between Allen and the next tier of QBs has shrunk. Don't get me wrong: Allen's still in that top tier. But the next couple of tiers have moved up. I know the axiom of always getting the bes...

I would 100% take Waddle.

I'm holding (though I get why you'd make the trade). If you LOVE WR2 in this draft, then go ahead. But I think Olave's a legit WR, and the WR you get at 1.03 would have to be elite to be a tier-up. And 1.08 is a value pick. Heck, WR3 might even be there at 1.08... So it's fine if you're lower on Ola...

It's actually not a crazy overpay if you there's a guy you LOVE. If that's the case, I could sign off on this. For me, though, I'd hold. 1) There are 7.5 players currently considered in that top tier with JJ McCarthy the 0.5. I'm confident he'll go pretty high and will end up in that top rookie tier...

I would 100% accept this new offer. As tantalizing as getting a top-3 pick is -- and as good as the top 3 WRs look -- I don't think WR3 in 2024 is an absolute slam-dunk. Yes, I'd rather have that player than the one you'll get at 1.06. And I don't think the likelihood of success is that much greater...

I'm so confused.

How can you trade 1.06 if you already traded it?

And you're trading a QB (Burrow/Richardson) in a similar tier to Stroud to move down from 1.02 to 1.04 and also adding 1.06 (even though you already traded 1.06)?

Or maybe I'm misreading everything!

TheTroll wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:50 pm Fair deal for win now and retool later. I know DK is the best piece but for you, you can afford it

x2

I don't see a great reason to trade now. Odds are that vets will have more worth in season than now (yes, there's always a risk of injury). And I think your team is good enough to make some noise. So I'd let the off season and start of the season play out and then re-assess (presuming the only optio...

Not even close in value. Even less interested given your team. (Caveat: If it's a deeeep starting lineup, then maybe.)

In a rebuild -- and say it with me!! :) -- draft for value. That's it. IMO, that's unquestionably Williams at 1.01. You have lots of time (and future picks) to build out a roster for need when you get to that point. (If that's not convincing enough, the fact that you start only 2 WRs drops their val...