Dynasty League Football Forum

Boyd is overrated.. he's nowhere near a good enough foundation piece for DJM.

With this evenings news on JAX wanting to bring in comp. I take the OBJ side Not at all trying to pick on you, Adam_172, so please don't take it that way. I just think it's important thing to highlight that this isn't 'news' in any real sense. Not in the traditional sense (ie. nothing has happened)...

I'm the lone guy around here yelling 'Sell RBs while you can!'.. so I'm all for moving Barkley. But this is essentially Barkley for Aiyuk. And while you can love Aiyuk, you just can't make this move.

Better a year too early than a year too late. Sell CMC while you can.

While Murray has more rushing upside, Allen's rushing upside isn't too far away. But we've seen Allen produce as a passer in a way that we're still hoping Murray shows at some point. My feeling is that a passing skills are more dependable than rushing skills. So I side with Allen. Not by a mile, but...

The value is fairly even. But in terms of dynasty strategy, you always want to be selling guys just before they hit a value cliff. MT's minutes away from that. So, if you believe in Sutton (I do), this is a perfect trade.

Straight up, I'd take ODB over JRob. It has more to do with their respective risk profiles than anything else. But it also has to do with what we're all trying to do this early in every offseason for all time.. sell high on RBs while you can. And because I don't really value Mooney, I'd muuuuch rath...

This post is a rebuttal to DonBrazi. If others decide to read it, I hope you gain some perspective in your own thoughts about a 1.75 TE premium. ...To the OP, my apologies for hijacking your thread. I will not be commenting further. This type of dialogue is a good thing and I don't think you should...

At every stage or your stated thought process, I think you're building in an objectively problematic bias into your analysis. As such, our disagreement is about your process. Not the data. And it has to be in our best interest to ask whether we're looking at things objectively. 1st Statement: In my ...

Until something dramatic changes in DET, I'm taking 1.01 > Swift, straight up. Probably even 1.02 and 1.03..

Well a year in the pros is better information than college though... plenty of “better” prospects have failed in the nfl. I’ll take chase and 1.07 as well, but I’m definitely taking Jefferson over chase 1 for 1. Don't get me wrong.. I'm not saying Chase > Jefferson. I'm just saying that we shouldn'...

Why on Earth we're using Kelce's 2020 as the barometer for player values is beyond me. It's also beyond me why TEs get the benefit of being compared to replacement level TEs, but Barkley is only compared to an RB2. The point is that while the top-tier TEs are way more valuable than their counterpart...

Hambone wrote: ↑Mon Mar 08, 2021 6:49 amI think 1.75 is a big difference when talking the top tier TEs..

...most people do.

It's not.

Maybe I'm wrong here, but I'm pretty sure that millions of people saw Jefferson and Chase play on the same team, on the same field, at the same time.. and not 1 person ever said Jefferson was a better prospect than Chase. It's not a ding to Chase that he happened to be a year younger and will enter ...

1.75 isn't all that much of a premium for TEs. You need another 0.25 to start to make a difference.. or some other bonus (beefed up yardage points, for example).. or you have to start 2 TEs. All-in-all, 1.75 isn't much. And in a 12-team league, it's capped anyway. I think you HAVE to go Barkley here...