Dynasty League Football Forum

The league: https://www73.myfantasyleague.com/2020/home/40864#0 The bylaws: https://www73.myfantasyleague.com/2020/options?L=40864&O=26 The scoring: https://www73.myfantasyleague.com/2020/options?L=40864&O=09 4-team dispersal pool: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fZq3uefmjLPJc3QV7zwO...

I would take Team F from this group. I think this has the best jump on building a long term contender with Jackson, Barkley, Lamb, Higgins, Golladay, Pittman, and Hockenson. Adding to it at the 1.09 will be a nice piece also. This is my thought.. and I also think it has the most roster value/flexib...

I wouldn't move Dak, alone, for that. So it's a slam dunk, in my book.

It might be fine in terms of value. But the construct of the trade is pretty bad. It's consolidating a loooot of youth and upside into one declining asset. Yah, CMC has a lot of tread left on his tires, but his value is guaranteed to only go down from here. I hate the trade. If you want a CMC, you s...

Value aside, this is a rather disgusting trade. The format of it is about as bad as you can get. There's nothing to balance out the benefits/risks on either side. Moving the picks for Adams could be disastrous if he doesn't put up another historically great season (which he isn't likely to) and movi...

Pile on.. the key here (that's been pointed out already) is that it's a 1QB league. QBs aren't nearly so valuable to be passing on potential stud WRs.

Option E (or 5?): I'd do any and all of those options.

To me, both sides are near equal, if you remove the picks. So I agree with you.

That being the case, seems like if you value one side over the other, it's a decent price to get your guys. If you don't, there's no reason to lose value by swapping picks.

Piling on that DJM > Sanders, in terms of value.

And with your squad, I see no reason to move to Sanders even if you got Sanders+ (like you should be able to) for DJM.

Zhoward88 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 23, 2021 2:46 pm Anytime a QB runs is going to be riskier.

Pretty sure we've proven this to be false. I don't have any sources at hand.. but I'm pretty sure. From what I remember, the pocket is where most QB injuries occur.. not outside the pocket. And not on designed runs.

...looking forward to this one filling up.

I'm not big on DK. I'd have no problem taking any of the top-4 non-QBs over him.. well.. other than market value considerations.

Hunt has a pretty clearly defined role in Cleveland and he actually produced better numbers with Chubb healthy. He finished rb 10 in my ppr league. So going for it I'll take Hunt over the 1.9. I don't follow the logic you guys are using in this thread. If you're 'going for it', why would you cap yo...

Mcknic wrote: ↑Thu Mar 18, 2021 4:00 pm Who are the rookies you have over Hunt?

Apologies for the lack of detail.. but I can say:
1 QB
4 WRs
3 RBs
1 TE

and there are 2 more WRs I'd hiiiighly consider adding to the list.

Oof.. Burrow over guys like Watson and Wilson is huge gamble. I wouldn't be able to take that kind of gamble so early in a startup. I cringe when I think about all the people who did that exact same thing with Baker..