Dynasty League Football Forum

BeerMoneyDynasty wrote: ↑Tue Oct 30, 2018 10:56 am What a great day.

I can't wait to get home, crack a beer, and celebrate. haha.

Anyone else in the same boat today?!

Why wait until you get home!

1. We did a live auction. We have a 10 team league, and started with 25 man rosters (escalated to 28 in year 2 and 30 in year 3). Our league has a rookie draft, but for year one since we didn't have a previous year record to go off of we simply allowed rookies to be signed for 5 years (regular FA we...

I ended up getting the 1st pick package for 5.475 million. I'm thinking that I got a steal. Well done. I've done some back calculating on what the 1.01 pick is worth (by itself) in my league and the value was basically 14% of the salary cap (rookie contracts have a premium in my league, though). Co...

My take: you are downgrading at WR, but if you can use that extra $8 this year to get another quality WR (low end WR1, high end WR2) then I would do it.

@chumway In our league we allow the trade partners to come to terms with the salaries for that year or even beyond. It is similar to the MLB where a team can take on part of a contract for a player that is traded. Most in-season trades end up with the respective teams either taking on the contract ...

Thanks everyone for the details. I have been trying to put a taxi squad in place in our league for a couple years, but no dice. For perspective, the arguments against it have been: 1) bad teams will taxi squad viable players in order to "tank" and secure better rookie draft picks; 2) addin...

My league uses the same $ amount for every year of the contract, but we have a dedicated rookie draft and the salaries of the players taken in this draft escalate.

In our league we allow the trade partners to come to terms with the salaries for that year or even beyond. It is similar to the MLB where a team can take on part of a contract for a player that is traded. Most in-season trades end up with the respective teams either taking on the contract of the pla...

Depending on starting requirements you might be a little thin at WR at times this year, but I would take it.

I can see why the trade caused a lot of reaction because it will have a lot of effect on this year and also for subsequent years (for different reasons). It is very much a play to win this year while mortgaging the future, which is a strategy that can't be knocked. The AP contract is kind of like a ...

Bennett as well.

At face value I wouldn't do that trade just yet. The TRich to Indy trade is still pretty fresh and I'm wondering if something about TRich (health, he shot a guy) might come out in the next couple days. I wouldn't chance a current and potential future stud with unknowns out there.

JFever wrote:Is it Bobby Rainey time?

(cut to scene of Browns fans holding their heads in their hands and moaning)

My logic: Gio > Bell, Hopkins>>Brown. I wouldn't even counter offer if I was the Bell/Brown owner. I agree that if you can get Gio for Bell I would pull the trigger.

Personally I would continue with the auction each year. We have contracts based on years, so there is always a player pool available each off season but other leagues allow only a certain amount of keepers, thus replenishing the player pool. In this case you can put rookies into the free agent pool ...