Dynasty League Football Forum

Always comes down to the flow of the draft. But in most SF leagues the QBs go fast and furious (until they don't). I have Maye at approx QB18 for dynasty. Guys I want just ahead of him: Goff, Tua, Daniels, Purdy. Guys I'd take Maye just ahead of: BY, Baker, Cousins, Levis. Guy I can't decide on: JJM...

1.04 deal - unless you see Nabers and Odunze as more or less equal, I'm for sure doing that deal. I have the 1.05 and can't move up so I'm settled on taking Odunze which is a minor disappointment. 1.01 - I'm with the other guys and agree that CW should be the 1.01 (taking MHJR does leave some money ...

Waddle's getting that bag. $84.75m with almost all ($76m) of that guaranteed. Lots of money tied up in WRs down there in Miami. They need to get Tua a new contract too. Damn. Or do they..........? :think: :think: I'm not sure they are all in on him yet. This year will mean a lot. They can always ta...

You have a lot of options and they're all good. Stay and pick Nabers or Odunze. Trade back and still get Bowers or Odunze maybe. Or, given your biggest need is RB, I'd keep trading back and grab the cheapest of Penix, Benson, or Brooks (my personal preference among rbs is Benson but Brooks is value...

Burrow over the other two. Murray and CW is a push IMO. If the guy wants a deal, I'd ask for a sweetener - that's the cost of him showing up looking to trade.

kellysheroes wrote: ↑Thu May 30, 2024 3:25 am DJM is getting so undervalued in these trades

He's always undervalued. There are posts after posts about him vs. late first round picks in SF. The "All Undervalued Club" is DJM, Pittman and Metcalf.

I'm assuming this is the team in your sig w/ AJB. If so, I'd pull the trigger and take JJ. You have the depth and youth to afford this. The 1.06 is a very good pick (but not elite). Any deal that has you getting JJ is going to cause some discomfort (this one does) but that's what it takes.

I'm only bidding on Dobbins if I'm a contender and weak at RB. You aren't weak at RB so I'd hold the FAAB.

This seems to significantly undervalue Purdy IMO. Counter with Cousins instead of Purdy and I like it. This is the only way I’d consider it..but even then I might need a bit more in return I think the value is fine if OP can do it with Cousins, but I don't like losing Adams from a contender. Why no...

I'd pass on both. Pickens is the best player in either deal and the value coming back just isn't enough for me to move him.

If Daniels is your ONLY choice I’d take Laporta over him. This is what I was wondering too. I agree with Troll that going QB is the right move but it's pretty hard to recommend a guy who hasn't seen a snap in the league over LaPorta in 2 pt TEP. If it's really Daniels or LaPorta, I'd grudgingly go ...

For an end of bench guy like JAMO or Downs I'd rather swing for the fences. Give me JAMO.

This seems to significantly undervalue Purdy IMO.

Easily Pickens/Pacheco. Almost like a free Pacheco.

If you believe in Barkley as a top-6 to 8 RB for '24 this is a solid deal given your roster. I know he's supposed to be that but I worry.