Search found 3374 matches
- Tue May 21, 2024 12:59 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
- Replies: 73
- Views: 7329
Re: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
So combined remaining roomie and devy draft makes some more sense. But man, that the 26 QBs did not go at all is WILD.
- Tue May 21, 2024 5:44 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
- Replies: 73
- Views: 7329
Re: Not at all early 2025 Draft thread
Hi Everyone, new on the forums in our devy league that we did draft in march 2024 i ended up drafting. really wanted to load Rb since it's a superflex league with another flex RB-wr-te treveyon, quinshon and many others were already gone. we can only player in the current draft and the one who will...
- Mon May 20, 2024 2:45 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
I saw a trade making the rounds on twitter today, asking this same question. I'm team #NeverVeto, but was a bit perplexed by this one. The trade was: Team A: 1.03+ AJB Team B: 1.02 + Daniel Jones + Hubbard + Bigsby + Renfrow The context was that there were two orphan teams. They found a manager and...
- Mon May 20, 2024 12:48 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
Good stuff here. I recently took on two new orphans as I liked the challenge of trying to resurrect them. One had the 1.01 and I wanted a share of Bijan so that plus the 1.06 was enough to entice me to take it over. Two years in and through a number of moves I have drafted Bijan, JSN, Downs, Harris...
- Mon May 20, 2024 12:46 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
I saw a trade making the rounds on twitter today, asking this same question. I'm team #NeverVeto, but was a bit perplexed by this one. The trade was: Team A: 1.03+ AJB Team B: 1.02 + Daniel Jones + Hubbard + Bigsby + Renfrow The context was that there were two orphan teams. They found a manager and...
- Sat May 18, 2024 9:37 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
Not. At. All. I'm saying that I don't think it's 50% lopsided. I certainly don't think it's egregious, as the title of your post suggests. You're making the argument (I think) that Commish/league intervention should not be reserved for collusion only. IMO, that's an interesting conversation. What t...
- Fri May 17, 2024 2:19 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
I mean, that's not a trade that should have a veto or commish involvement. I'd rather have the Mahomes side, but without seeing the league, rosters, scoring, and depth for these guys it seems fine. Maybe the Mahomes owner also has a lack of RBs, maybe the own Wilson too, maybe they have Williams an...
- Fri May 17, 2024 1:34 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
Finally, here is the trade that I saw that started this thread: 10 Team SF A: Mahomes, Curtis Samuel B: KW3, Deebo, Fields I mean, that's not a trade that should have a veto or commish involvement. I'd rather have the Mahomes side, but without seeing the league, rosters, scoring, and depth for thes...
- Fri May 17, 2024 1:20 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
The bolded is what I was asking in starting this thread. Or rather, just asking what is it that would trigger someone to want a trade vetoed. I was thinking about this kind of on the whole and found a good thought experiment of what I think would help the discussion: When we deal with players, peop...
- Fri May 17, 2024 9:10 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
There's gray area on how bad a trade needs to be in order to veto or determine collusion. Extreme example but say in 2021 you traded Trey Lance for a 2023 3rd. The league would go nuts. But what if that 3rd turned into Puka? This argument is one that people make ALL. THE. TIME. It is wholly illogic...
- Fri May 17, 2024 7:14 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
There's gray area on how bad a trade needs to be in order to veto or determine collusion. Extreme example but say in 2021 you traded Trey Lance for a 2023 3rd. The league would go nuts. But what if that 3rd turned into Puka? This argument is one that people make ALL. THE. TIME. It is wholly illogic...
- Fri May 17, 2024 6:48 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Re: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
Collusion duh. League health also matters significantly. If there's a deal that absolutely pillages a team, people need to step in. What is a threshold of "pillages" for you? And it doesn't even have to be that egregious. Someone trading Mahomes for JJMcCarthy+pieces, I'll let this horrib...
- Thu May 16, 2024 5:09 pm
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
- Replies: 45
- Views: 1089
Discussion: How egregious does a trade need to be before you support a veto?
Topic title. Feel free to articulate it however you like.
Only collusion?
A specific gap in value?
A new owner being an idiot?
League health?
Only collusion?
A specific gap in value?
A new owner being an idiot?
League health?
- Thu May 16, 2024 5:18 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Adonai AD Mitchell Official Thread
- Replies: 71
- Views: 3040
Re: Adonai AD Mitchell Official Thread
I just got him with pick 26 in my first draft. You kidding me? This after i went with btj with pick 10. My draft is going to have a high bust risk. But could also boom to the Max. I get that draft spot. I really like Mitchell’s talent a lot, but I can’t help but think IND is setting up a BAL O clon...
- Tue May 14, 2024 9:44 am
- Forum: Dynasty League Discussion
- Topic: Why Rome Odunze is the WR2 in the class
- Replies: 59
- Views: 2422
Re: Why Rome Odunze is the WR2 in the class
Even in conferences that "have good Ds" that doesn't mean that the CBs are good. If you want to pull stats like this, pull stats where a WR faced NFL drafted CBs. Odunze, Nabers, any WR.